front axle module wrangler jl

FAD, a theoretical weak spot in Wrangler’s solid axle

The Jeep Wrangler is one of the last 4×4 vehicles on earth to retain the solid front axle. The rest of the world went with an independent front suspension for improved ride quality and steering, at a slight sacrifice of off-road abilities. I recently wrote an article for Hagerty about the Wrangler EcoDiesel and how it varies from the gasoline Wrangler. You should check it out.

While crawling under that Wrangler I noticed something attached to the solid front axle. On the passenger side, opposite to the pumpkin, there was a welded-on bracket with something attached to it. There was a sticker on it that said “front axle module”. I had no idea what that could be. I was guessing it is an electronically driven component with a sensor of some kind. But why? Why was this there, on a part of the vehicle that is purely mechanical – an axle coming out of the pumpkin, heading to the wheel hub. I have not seen this on older Wranglers.

This puzzlement pushed me to jump-start my internet searching device. Within a few minutes, I got my answer.

jl wrangler fad front axle disconnect

It turns out that it is a front-axle disconnect module or FAD. The FAD, which is present on all JL and JT Jeeps, disconnects left and right front axles from each other when the vehicle is in two-wheel-drive. This reduces the drag that a connected axle would create by spinning the differential gears and the front driveshaft while the vehicle is moving. Remember manually-locking hubs? The FAD replaced those – same purpose.

So this gadget basically improves fuel economy and probably reduces some wear and tear. The below video shows how it works in detail.

The video also points out that the FAD may be a weak spot in an otherwise solid axle (see what I did there?). The half axle itself is now made of two components and a collar. The axle housing basically has a hole in it, weakening its tubular structure. Further, the mechanism itself may malfunction. Jeep message boards are filled with theories about FAD failure but most of those seem to be just that, theories. The fact is the FAD, or an axle disconnect device like it has been used for my years or various vehicles without many issues.

Most FAD problems seem to arise from an impact that the axle took near where the FAD is mounted. While a solid axle can take a hit, expectations should be real. The axle is not a bumper – navigate your obstacles better. Potential problems may arise when mounting taller and heavier tires. In a slippery off-road environment, where axle forces are at their highest, those big heavy tires do require a lot more force to spin them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

11 responses to “FAD, a theoretical weak spot in Wrangler’s solid axle”

  1. Wayne Moyer Avatar
    Wayne Moyer

    Come on do I really have to be the first one who says that this is just a fad and that Fiat Chrysler Boeing will get rid of it with the next model?

    1. Vairship Avatar
      Vairship

      When you’re driving down the freeway at 70mph and your FAD dies, everything FADes to black…

      1. Wayne Moyer Avatar
        Wayne Moyer

        Metallica enters the discussion.

        1. nanoop Avatar

          So does the sandman. Where’s the door?

  2. Sjalabais Avatar
    Sjalabais

    Now that’s just fadulous!

    Seriously though, if this is baby steps away from a solid axel, would die hard fans feel foley if they just went all the way to modernity?

  3. wunno sev Avatar
    wunno sev

    there’s a #WAP joke to be made here but I’ll let you all fill in the blanks

  4. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    People seem to have forgotten the jeep YJ yet again. It DID use a very similar system called a central axle disconnect, in the 90’s it was vacuum powered and exactly how the 4×4 system worked for the front axle.

    1. Dan Raff Avatar
      Dan Raff

      I was just getting ready to say that. I can imagine that the author of this article wasn’t born then? Amazing that they can’t do research though.

      1. Kamil K Avatar

        Hi. I was born in the late 70’s. I mentioned that “The fact is the FAD, or an axle disconnect device like it has been used for my years or various vehicles without many issues” but you’d need to read to understand that. The unit on the YJ was vacuum operated and this one is electric. While their function is the same, the approach was different.
        Cheers!

  5. Steve Avatar
    Steve

    I’m in awe that you got to write this article. YJ had a passenger side vacuum disconnect thru at least 1992. XJ Cherokee had it until the Renix swap. It is preferred for auto lockers because you can disconnect the axle so you don’t bind up on pavement.

  6. Cecil Avatar

    Well let’s see, um Jeep reverse engineered to cheep parts for more profit for the front office, was that quicker than the jeeppro barker that stumbled not disclosing its A1 junk, I toy my brain thinking I should buy a rubi but the left side of my brain tells me they are junk, I have an older 4×4 chassis that will crawl thru 18 “ of thick mud,logs , deep holes , if I could find a wrangler body to stick it on every Jeep driver would say I want one. Yes I remember 4 wheel drive before they became reverse engineered. So I’m ruined. Today a rubicon says it’s got open diffs that means one wheel front and back a total of two wheels drive system, oh I know they lock the two half axels with a pen, that’s great til non slip situation breaks the locker pen, and grinds up the piñon ring and bearings. Jeep also markets brake lock well unless they put individual brake controllers on each wheel they don’t so it’s marketing wizbang crap. More junk that breaks easy, don’t believe the marketing mystery lies Dana 44s are weak prone to break and tear apart.