We Ride: Royal Enfield Int 650

[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”no” equal_height_columns=”no” menu_anchor=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” background_color=”” background_image=”” background_position=”center center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” fade=”no” background_parallax=”none” parallax_speed=”0.3″ video_mp4=”” video_webm=”” video_ogv=”” video_url=”” video_aspect_ratio=”16:9″ video_loop=”yes” video_mute=”yes” overlay_color=”” video_preview_image=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” padding_top=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” padding_right=””][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ layout=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” border_position=”all” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” center_content=”no” last=”no” min_height=”” hover_type=”none” link=””][fusion_text columns=”” column_min_width=”” column_spacing=”” rule_style=”default” rule_size=”” rule_color=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=””]

I’ve got an embarrassing confession to make: I’m a slow motorcycle rider. Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy some brisk acceleration, but I’m not out there dragging knees and throwing up dank wheelies. In all reality, I push my car way harder than my bike. There’s a lot of reasons for that, but primarily I’m just a big sissy. But I don’t ride motorcycles because to be the fastest thing out there. Sure, I like being able to leave traffic behind, but that’s never been the point. For me, motorcycling has always been about taking the purest essence of driving, that surreal melding of man and machine, and then cooking it down, and injecting it straight into my spine.

That’s why I was so smitten with the Royal Enfield Int 650. It gave me back that pure joy, without any of the frippery or pretensions. It was just…nice.

[Disclaimer: Engle Motors of Kansas City, MO generously provided the motorcycle and a full tank of fuel https://www.englemotors.com/]

[/fusion_text][fusion_imageframe image_id=”274672″ max_width=”” style_type=”” blur=”” stylecolor=”” hover_type=”liftup” bordersize=”” bordercolor=”” borderradius=”” align=”none” lightbox=”no” gallery_id=”” lightbox_image=”” alt=”” link=”” linktarget=”_self” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]https://hooniverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IMG_2113_.jpg[/fusion_imageframe][fusion_text columns=”” column_min_width=”” column_spacing=”” rule_style=”default” rule_size=”” rule_color=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=””]

Also, it’s called the Int 650 here, but the Interceptor 650 in other countries, so I’m just going to call it the Interceptor for the rest of the article. Yes, I know it’s physically labeled as Int 650, but come on. How rad does it feel to say, “I think I’m taking the Interceptor out today”? Right.

Royal Enfield’s history is a bit complicated, as they are, or were, an English company, that started shipping bikes to India, and eventually licensed a company there to begin building new motorcycles there under the Royal Enfield name. Eventually in the 1970s, the British company folded like so many others, leaving just their Indian brethren to continue on the name. That Indian branch is still thriving today, and is now churning out new models, and exporting them worldwide. So India is building bikes under an English name, and selling them back to England. Is that irony? Poetry? I’m not sure.

[/fusion_text][fusion_imageframe image_id=”274667″ max_width=”” style_type=”” blur=”” stylecolor=”” hover_type=”liftup” bordersize=”” bordercolor=”” borderradius=”” align=”none” lightbox=”no” gallery_id=”” lightbox_image=”” alt=”” link=”” linktarget=”_self” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]https://hooniverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IMG_2076_.jpg[/fusion_imageframe][fusion_text columns=”” column_min_width=”” column_spacing=”” rule_style=”default” rule_size=”” rule_color=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=””]

I know some of you right there are going to write the bike off, and go to close this window because you saw it was made in India. Yes, I understand that. I’ve spent some time in the manufacturing world, and “made in India” does not always bode well for rigorous quality control, it’s true. But nowhere on the Enfield did I see any signs of sloppiness or shoddiness. There’s a few points where you can tell things were built to a budget, as I’ll get into later, but the overall fit and finish was excellent, and easily comparable to bikes coming out of Japan.

The Interceptor is a class of motorcycle that doesn’t really exist anymore. These days, everything is hyper specialized to carve out some microniche in the market. While Royal Enfield does make some more specialized machines, the Interceptor is just a motorcycle. It’s not a sportsbike, it’s not a cruiser, it’s not a chopper, it’s not an enduro, it’s not a bagger, it’s not an adventure bike. It’s just a standard motorcycle.

The Interceptor 650, as you can probably guess, has a 650cc engine. It’s a twin, which means just two cylinders. See, motorcycle lingo is fun! As things would happen to shake out, my own motorcycle, the venerable Suzuki SV650, also has a 650cc twin, which gives me a solid point of comparison.

[/fusion_text][fusion_imageframe image_id=”274663″ max_width=”” style_type=”” blur=”” stylecolor=”” hover_type=”liftup” bordersize=”” bordercolor=”” borderradius=”” align=”none” lightbox=”no” gallery_id=”” lightbox_image=”” alt=”” link=”” linktarget=”_self” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]https://hooniverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IMG_1940_.jpg[/fusion_imageframe][fusion_text columns=”” column_min_width=”” column_spacing=”” rule_style=”default” rule_size=”” rule_color=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=””]

One of the first things that struck me on the Enfield was the riding position. You don’t don’t slump back in a recliner like on a cruiser, or crouch down like a chihuahua humping a pillow like on a sportsbike, you sit bolt upright like a thing on another thing. The gas tank narrows where your knees meet it, and the combination of the two things almost made me feel like I was on a scooter. Upright seating position, legs relatively close together, it all flows together into making a very utilitarian package.

At some point, you’re going to look at the statistics of the bike, and get all out of sorts. So let’s be honest: the Interceptor isn’t exactly the fastest thing on two wheels. It pumps out 47 horsepower from its parallel twin engine, which is certainly enough to scoot it along. But just for reference, my 13 year old bike, with the same number of cylinders and the same displacement, makes 73. So the Enfield is down by a third right out of the gate.

But I don’t see that as a negative, it just requires some cognitive reframing. Every automotive blogger likes to preach the mantra of “slow car fast”, which is that it’s more fun to have a car that you can use 100% of the performance of a majority of the time, instead of an overpowered car where you never go near the throttle for fear of prison or death. The Interceptor can be viewed in that same light.

On some modern sportbikes, if you ever get into the meaty haunches of the powerband, in any gear, you’re at extra-legal speeds. On the Interceptor, I went absolute pinned open full throttle, in three gears in a row, just to merge onto the highway. That sounds like a weird thing to be happy about, but there it is. Everyone always talks about how shifting gears themselves is so integral to the motoring experience, but to really embrace that, get yourself with something with lower power and lower revs, where you play on that shifter all day. It’s a motorcycle. Play around with it.

But it being on the lower end of the power spectrum (dips on that name for my thrash metal band) also means that it is incredibly unintimidating to ride. I’d also been curious if that would hinder it on the highway, but the Interceptor pulled to interstate speeds easily, and cruised comfortably at 70 miles per hour with plenty of revs to spare.

While you can absolutely hustle it along, eking out every ounce of acceleration, it’s just as happy to chill out for a second, man. Everything on the Enfield is just a bit softer and more mellow than on my bike. The brakes are plenty effective, but both of them are missing that aggressive initial bite. This makes dealing with city riding way less stressful. The clutch as well required a bit more slip, and a bit more revs than I was used to. Everything doesn’t need to be a drag launch, just chill out and let it roll. It’s cool, man. Everything’s fine.

Somewhat embarrassingly, I frequently found myself in way too low of a gear on the highway, entirely by accident. On motorcycles, I tend to not pay much attention to the physical gauges, and instead go by gut gauges in regards to revs and speed. As in “yeah, this feels about fast enough”, or “I should probably shift”. When you’re trying to prevent that white CR-V (why is it always a white CR-V?) from murdering you, you need your eyes up, not down looking at silly things like “numbers”. Numbers, who needs ’em? So anyways, I’d be cruising along at 6,000 RPM or so, which in sixth gear on my SV650 is right about 70 miles per hour, when I’d notice that at 6,000 on this, my mirrors were getting a lot of vibration. Then I’d finally remember that the Interceptor redlines about 3,000 RPM lower than my SV. So I wasn’t really in sixth gear, instead it was more like fourth. Whoops.

While I didn’t have a lot of time to put the bike through its paces, we did spend a bit of time running up and down some tight switchbacks for photos, and the Interceptor was impressive here as well. Now, as I’ve said, I’m not a very aggressive rider, but on the Enfield, I quickly started to get more comfortable with leaning it farther and farther. It was there holding my hand telling me “it’s ok buddy, you’ve got this. We can do it together.” Sure, I wasn’t hanging off dragging a knee, but for a bike I’d been on for half an hour, on a road I didn’t know, I was surprised at how quickly the confidence grew.

The suspension was also much better than expected at tolerating our terrible roads. My first experience riding the Interceptor was in the West Bottoms of Kansas City, which is the decidedly unglamorous former stockyards district. Picture turn of the century semi-abandoned warehouses and railyards. The roads there are exactly as good as you’d imagine. Add that to regular Midwestern freezes, and we have potholes aplenty. But the Interceptor handled most of it remarkably well. Individual bumps were soaked up without much complaint, although steady rough washboard type surfaces could definitely set things jiggling. I’m not sure how much of that is due to the remote reservoir rear shocks, but they look pretty trick, so I’ll give them the credit. They’re not Öhlins, but they kind of look like them. Make yourself some Bröhlins stickers and run with it.

As for complaints, I really don’t have many. Plus, most concerns I do have are easy to brush aside by nature of the price. Now, I tend to not discuss prices in reviews because 1) I don’t know or care about your budget, and b) that shit’s boring, but on the Royal Enfield, we really have to talk about it. The Interceptor 650 starts at $5,799 for a bike with ABS and fuel injection. That alone makes almost any complaints about equipment irrelevant. For a bit of comparison, to get a new Suzuki SV650 with ABS, you’re spending $7,499. A Honda CB500F with ABS is $6,499. Ok, the Suzuki makes more power, but it’s still a 650cc twin. The Honda is a smaller engine but similar power figures. A grand or two doesn’t mean anything in the world of cars, but when that’s 10% or more of the entire cost of the motorcycle, it becomes significant.

But if I didn’t nitpick, this would just be an ad. The mirrors are a bit wonky. I never could get the right side one adjusted to an angle that was useful to me. Maybe with a if I loosened the whole thing and repositioned it it could be something salvageable, but as it was, I got a mediocre view of my right shoulder. The left mirror I got adjusted to a better spot, but then by the end of the ride it would flap back everytime I accelerated, and I had to keep pushing it back into place. They also didn’t have the best image clarity, and sometimes got a bit shakey. So pitch those, and buy some nice CRG bar-end ones.

Finding neutral was also always a bit weird for me. For those of you who don’t know, on a motorcycle, you have a sequential transmission, which means you run through all your gears in order, up or down, with no skipping around. Neutral is placed between first and second gears. It’s not a full click into second, but just a half click that gets you into neutral. But on the Enfield, it felt like less than a half click. More like “think about clicking it up, and that’s enough”. I’m sure you’d get used to it, and it probably means you don’t accidentally kick it into neutral much, but I always had to triple check I had it right before taking my hand off the clutch.

Also, if I’m honest, I didn’t love the fact that the gauge cluster just has one icon for both your turn signals. Regardless of which one is on, the same icon flashes. This isn’t a major issue, because you can literally grab the turn signal in front of you, so if you can’t tell which one is on, you’ve got bigger problems. But still, I’d have preferred an arrow indicator on each side. I’m aware that they’re building to a price point, and you consolidate where you can. If it means on little stuff like that, instead of the drivetrain or chassis, I’m down with that.

This is also a motorcycle you should never ride in shorts. In reality, you shouldn’t ride any motorcycle in shorts, but squids gonna squid. But with the way the Interceptor is set up, my right leg occasionally rested right against the engine when I was standing at a stop, and good lord does that get toasty. I’m sure I was running it way hotter than normal by doing photoshoot riding, which is obnoxiously taxing on the bike and the rider. Ride by at slow to medium speed, do a u-turn, ride by at slow to medium speed, do a three point turn, ride by at slow to medium speed, stop to discuss strategy, do three point turn. So I wasn’t getting up to speed to let some air blow some of that heat away. It would probably be amazing in the fall, but in late Spring in the Midwest, it was just melty.

If these sound like minor, totally inconsequential complaints, they are. I loved that little bike. So much of the industry is focused on being the brightest and the fastest, so I love that Royal Enfield went the other direction. There’s something to be said for a simple, honest motorcycle that’s pleasant to ride. Remember kids, this was all supposed to be fun.

[Images courtesy of Travis Carroll]

[/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

17 responses to “We Ride: Royal Enfield Int 650”

  1. Batshitbox Avatar
    Batshitbox

    I’m happy to see Enfields on the US market, but I have no use for one at this stage of my MC career. I think the niche market for these is people who can’t find an unmolested XS650 to molest, can’t afford a Triumph Street Twin, and need more engine than the Yamaha SR400 and Suzuki VanVan retro bikes provide. Or people whose Enfield Bullet and Ural CT are broken down and can’t be bothered to fix them.

    1983 Yamaha XS650
    Air-cooled parallel twin
    50 HP
    420 lbs
    Disk (1) front, drum rear
    5-speed trans.

    1. Andrew Fails Avatar
      Andrew Fails

      I don’t see the Enfield as a niche bike at all. 650cc with ABS seems about as middle of the road as you can go. Considering the Triumph is nearly twice the price, I don’t really think anyone is cross-shopping those. The SR400 has a smaller engine and you need to kickstart it (really?) and the VanVan has an engine a third of the size.

      1. Batshitbox Avatar
        Batshitbox

        Excellent job of re-stating almost everything I said in my comment. Triumph is more expensive, SR400 and VanVan are smaller.

        While we’re re-stating the above let me be clear that I like this bike. Seeing them on the roads here makes me smile, I hope they make a profit and have satisfied customers, I’m sure it’s a lot easier to wrench on than modern puzzle-box bikes. I will never buy one.

        As for it being a niche-market bike, well there’s always been retro styled bikes on the market, like the Kawasaki W650, or bikes that just never went out of production. This is solidly in that retro bike niche, and will probably sell about as well. The bulk of the market won’t want it, they want EX-6s and SV650s.

        As for it being ‘middle of the road’, it’s demonstrably comparable to what the XS650 was when retired as a platform 35 years ago, so as a technological achievement it’s in the middle of the Reagan Era more than the middle of the road. Your lede image talks about craving something different, which seems to rule out ‘the middle of the road’ and point towards the margins (or niches?)

        1. Rover 1 Avatar
          Rover 1

          ABS is kind-of a big deal though, isn’t it?

          1. Batshitbox Avatar
            Batshitbox

            The fuel injection, ABS and 270 degree crank are the least retro and most middle-of-the-road things about this bike. Bikes have had those things since the ’90s, so now they’re NBD.

          2. Rover 1 Avatar
            Rover 1

            ABS is compulsorily mandated for EU sales, so there is that. Maybe middle of the road is the new niche.

  2. ptschett Avatar
    ptschett

    47 HP from a 650 twin on a standard-pattern bike? Doesn’t sound too bad.
    My dual-sport KLR650 had a thumper single of the same displacement making roughly 40 HP, and it was fine even on my local 70-75 MPH (but flat… as in the bottom of Glacial Lake Agassiz, flat) interstates. I could live with passing all the trucks and being harmonious with most of the cars. (Though if I was in a car, I’d be passing almost all the cars that passed me on the bike.)

  3. Lokki Avatar
    Lokki

    The Interceptor is a class of motorcycle that doesn’t really exist anymore.

    Yes, The Royal Enfield (insert appropriate model name here) is a “commuter class” bike. The heyday of commuter bikes was roughly from 1935 to 1965 in The UK, Europe, and Japan*. The virtue of a commuter bike, in those days, was affordability and its appeal was “beats walking” (and to be fair, better than a bicycle or the train). The advent of the Mini and similar cars killed the market for them. Anybody who has actually commuted by bike in the rain or in the winter will cheerfully pay a little more for the stability of two more wheels, a way to carry the groceries (without the invocation of a design and engineering degree), and an enclosure that keeps you and especially your feet -ever been soaked up to your knees by the splash from a cold rain?- dry. The hassle of a helmet requirement is a comparatively new thing which didn’t exist in the commuter bike era because when a significant portion of voters were motorcycle commuters, no politician was ever going to try to pass that one, so we shan’t factor that in. Besides, the ‘freeways’ didn’t even exist, and most riders were puttering along at city speeds of 35 or 40 mph max…even in the countryside, so the need for helmets was less especially for a generation more accepting of the idea that “everybody poops dies”, and so less concerned about some abstract concept of safety.

    But, let’s meander back towards The Royal Enfield. The dying demand for commuter bikes coincided with two significant factors: the introduction of the Japanese (read modern and maintenance free) motorcycle to the European et al market, and the emergence of India into the Industrial Age in the mid 1960’s. Swept from the remaining already shrunken Continental commuter market by bikes like the Honda Cub and other small bikes, the other-wise dead Royal Enfield factory found a new home in India. The name still had cache in India, and the 1930’s design and manufacturing requirements meant that it could be reliably manufactured in India’s less sophisticated environment. Further, the Indian government of the day had a policy of keeping foreign made goods OUT. This policy stayed in force for decades, making India ‘the land that Time new technology” forgot, allowing British design an uncontested field where Lucas, Prince Of Darkness, was accepted as just one of many evil gods in the pantheon. Honestly speaking though, the rugged, reliable, “fix-er-with-a-rock” mild steel design of the Royal Enfield was perfect for the time and place especially with the Soviet-Lada like interchangeability of parts between any two bikes parked on the street regardless of decade of manufacture. For those who have grown up in the Internet/Amazon Prime era, there was a time when the ability to get parts was a BIG DEAL. Japanese bikes rarely needed parts, but if they did Japanese small batch manufacturing often meant year and model specific parts meaning ‘not-in-stock’ meaning you had to add the time of a letter to Japan plus the sailing time of an ship across the Pacific to your repair estimate…. For Italian bikes, St Crispan help the man whose bike broke in July. The Italian August Vacation (still a thing according to Alfa Owners), means October or November before the wrong part would be shipped. In such an environment, having spare parts literally as close as your neighbor’s house is a big virtue.

    Now finally, to the Royal Enfield Interceptor of today. A vertical twin engine is really a pleasant thing, especially at lower rpms, where there’s ample torque which allows lazy shifting. At higher rpms vibration becomes an annoyance; interstate work will require rubber-bushed handlebars and foam handgrips if you ever want your hands to stop tingling someday. The short version….you won’t enjoy high speeds (like 60 mph) on this bike.

    The other drawback is that various will things shake out of adjustment (and we’re not just talking mirrors here), or completely loose. The Enfield owner will learn to do a pre-flight walk-around…and get used to to a drop or more of oil on the ground. Without personal experience, it’s impossible to speculate how solid the solid-state electronics of the ignition/injection and abs systems will be. Still, one can safely guess that you won’t be fixing the modern electronics components with a rock if a solder joint does fail from vibration. You’re gonna walk home.

    As for handling, the Royal Enfields never had the renown of the Nortons, just as they never had the fame of the Triumph engines. There was a legendary combination of a Triumph-twin engine with a Norton ‘Featherbed’ frame nicknamed ‘The Triton’ which was supposed to give the best of both worlds performance and handling. Nobody ever subbed in a Royal Enfield engine or frame. Let’s just say that, like Rolls Royce horsepower, the Royal Enfield’s handling was “adequate”… for the task for which it was intended.

    So, the Royal Enfield will almost certainly remain a niche bike here in the U.S. or perhaps an niche-within-a-niche bike. It’s a relaxed suburban ride for someone who likes the torque of a vertical twin engine, wants the ‘cool factor of a classic Brit-Bike, but who isn’t willing to pay for a modern Triumph. No one will go canyon carving with his friends twice on a Royal Enfield. He’ll go home alone after either scared himself silly trying to keep up with the modern stuff, or having finally gotten embarrassed by finding his friends waiting for him to finally show up …for the third or fourth time. Still, it will make a very nice commuter bike if you live in a city where it doesn’t rain or snow often and which has a light rail service you can use when you want to go grocery shopping.

    This is not to suggest that the Royal Enfield is a bad bike… taken in isolation (say as in a market like India’s) it’s not. It has an okay ride, okay reliability, and okay handling, as long as you don’t compare it to anything else.

    * America’s greater distances and the affordability of the Model T et al made commuter bikes less appealing than they were in Europe, so American bikes were generally more sports or fleet-use (police, messenger service, military) oriented.

  4. Lokki Avatar
    Lokki

    1. Andrew Fails Avatar
      Andrew Fails

      My only response is I disagree with your comments about it being uncomfortable above 60mph. What did you think was so bad about it at highway speeds? It was nice and comfy at 70+ for me.

      1. Lokki Avatar
        Lokki

      2. Lokki Avatar
        Lokki

  5. Maymar Avatar
    Maymar

    This is somewhere around the exact motorcycle I’d want, but mostly I’m just disappointed that Honda doesn’t make a mid-displacement retro CB for about $1000 less. For that matter, the Canadian pricing is a bit harder to take – at $8000, it’s only an extra $2k to get a Triumph Street Twin (and less to get a base Ducati Scrambler or Moto Guzzi V7).

    That said, my ancient Rebel 250 was quick enough for me (although a little strained on the highway), so I’m not expecting much as far as performance goes.

  6. SlowJoeCrow Avatar
    SlowJoeCrow

    This would be interesting to ride, I have tried a Bullet and it was comfortable and sharp handling but felt a bit under powered and sounded like a lawnmower. I had more fun on 400cc dual sport, or my 1978 BMW R100S. To this day my favorite retro bike is the Honda GB 500 which is just modern enough.

  7. Batshitbox Avatar
    Batshitbox

    Wait, there’s something you’re not telling us about this motorcycle. Come on now, there’s no use trying to hide it, we all know it’s there.

    The left side of the bike.

    1. Andrew Fails Avatar
      Andrew Fails

      Hahaha, shit, you caught me.

      1. Batshitbox Avatar
        Batshitbox

        It’s a strangely common phenomenon. With some bikes it’s actually kind of difficult to find pictures of whichever is the unpopular side.