Two nights in two very different roof-top tents

Vehicular roof-top tents (RTT) are nothing new. Campers, explorers, and people who couldn’t afford hotels have been using them for decades. But because everyone is an overlander now days, they have recently surged in popularity. There are so many styles, sizes, and cost options that there is an RRT for everyone.

I have recently sampled two roof-top tents from the opposite ends of the market. The first one was a conventional, large, affordable Smittybilt fold-out tent. This well-used two year old tent was attached to my friend’s ’95 Toyota 4Runner and it part of a budget set-up, which I’ll discuss in the future.

The second RTT I used was attached to the Honda Passport that I used to get to the Overland Expo East. This Roofnest Sandpiper is significantly different from the Smittybilt. This is a hard-shell, pop-up tent. It is about half the size of the Smittybuilt and costs twice as much.

Please note that both of the tents I slept in were already mounted onto the vehicles. Each tent installation requires a strong roof rack and cross-bars installed onto the vehicle. Some planning is required for fold-out tents, based on the position of the hinges and the entrance to the tent. Any of these tents require at least two to people to mount onto a vehicle and about of hour to complete the full installation.

Setup of each tent varies dramatically. The Smittybilt has a multi-step process. First, the cover and straps need to be removed. It then needs to be unfolded. This process is relatively easy for one able-bodied person. The attached latter is used a lever to flip the tent open and as support once the tent is unfolded. Tighten the straps, attach the rain fly, and you’re done. Please see the below video from Extreme Terrain on the tent and how it works.

The erection (sorry) of the Roofnest Sandpiper is much easier. Simply unlatch the four latches, lift up the shell on front end until it pop-up, and repeat for the other side. Attach and secure the ladder to whichever side of the vehicle you want to use as an entrance to your tent. That’s it.

Both of these tents were much easier and much faster to setup than conventional ground tents. Each one has a built-in mattress, too. Being off the ground is also means being warmer at night and being on an even ground. I have seen people complain about RTTs in high winds but I haven’t experienced it.

The downside is that each tent takes up almost all the space on your roof. Roofnest says that the built-in aluminum rack can carry 100-pounds of gear with the tent closed, or 50-pounds with it open. Place the Smittybilt strategically on your vehicle and a cargo box could fit behind or on front of it.

The second downside is that both of these RTTs add about 150-pounds to the roof of your vehicle. That is a lot of weight to be added to a place where it’s least desirable. Vehicle dynamics are impacted, as is the fuel economy. Surprisingly, wind noise was not much of an issue on either vehicle.

The differences between each tent are instantly visible. The floor of the Smittybilt is much bigger, at 93-inches by 73-inches. My friend says that he slept in it with his wife and three small kids, with everyone strategically placed in the tent. Ideally, the heaviest of people should be laying in the half of that tent that is over the vehicle.

The Roofnest Sandpiper has a much smaller, 82-inch x 49-inch mattress. It’s designed for two adults, preferably ones who have been previously intimate with one another. Something-something knocking something-something Honda racking. The 38-inch flat-roof height is sufficient but much lower than the 51-inch vaulted Smittybilt.

There is more to the Roofnest than just its hard shell and ease of use. The interior is nicely insulated. The tent fabric is very thick, more like an autumn coat than a spring rain jacket. The mattress pad is thicker and much softer, almost like a home mattress than anything I’ve seen in tents before. And the whole tent is generally of very high quality.

Climbing into and out of each tent is easy for most healthy adults. Kids should be supervised. I’ve seen people carry dogs up and down a tent ladder and that was sketchy at best. RTT usage and alcohol consumption, and the related night bathroom runs could, could prove adventurous to some. Make sure the vehicle is on leveled ground.

The benefits of RTTs are evident, as are their drawbacks. Their cost, size, and weight should not be ignored. Neither should their comfort and ease of set-up. To minimalists who want to keep their camping affordable and simple, as it should be, RTTs may not the right answer. For people who don’t want a RV and but don’t like the hassles of tents, or generally subscribe to the whole overlanding thing, RTTs are solid option.

Disclaimer: Honda provided Roofnest tent, attached to its new Passport, for my trip to Overland Expo East, which was organized by Trail Trek Tour. My friend Vinny joined us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

9 responses to “Two nights in two very different roof-top tents”

  1. Zentropy Avatar

    I’m curious: what is the advantage of these over a regular tent? Or over my preference (when solo at least), a hammock tent? These seem like a bit of a hassle, and they’re certainly not cheap.

    1. 0A5599 Avatar

      I suppose there are advantages to being above the mud and cactus and fire ants. If you camp with young kids, even if they forget to zip the tent with the opening towards the top, snakes still aren’t likely to get in. The next morning, you can drive it to a sunbeam to burn off the dew before packing it away to get moldy. The floor is going to be flat regardless of whether there’s another rock every foot and a half. And some places don’t let you tie anything to a tree.

      Opening the tent is almost immediate instead of the extra five minutes to set poles and stakes, but by the time you climb the ladder with all your gear, the relative advantages are probably minimal. And with a standalone tent, you can leave it at base camp all day while you go exploring.

      The article mentions the insulation in the tent. I’m sure that’s beneficial in subzero temperatures. Frankly, I haven’t ever camped below 20 degrees Fahrenheit, and would have to rethink my gear if I did that on a regular basis. Or probably just stay home. And in 100 degree weather, I would expect an insulated tent not to be of any benefit.

    2. I_Borgward Avatar

      I did research on several rooftop tents and came to a few conclusions. They may well be useful in a few scenarios, mainly camping where the ground isn’t so good for pitching a conventional tent. On the other hand, the not-insignificant expense to purchase, added weight, difficulty in mounting and negative effect on gas mileage from aerodynamic drag are real drawbacks.Throw in having to find a place to store it when it’s not mounted and it all adds up to not being very practical. Having to climb down a ladder in the middle of the night to pee doesn’t sound like much fun, either. But, to each his own.

    3. crank_case Avatar

      Don’t know about parts of the US, but in a damp climate, you’re trying to put a tent down on damp, soft muddy ground. Also these might be handy for nature/landscape photographers as a sheltered platform.

    4. caltemus Avatar

      A hammock seems like a much better set of compromises than this

      1. Zentropy Avatar

        From my perspective, it is. I understand the limitations of a regular tent given the terrain, but a tented hammock is easy to put up/down and is easy to store. With it, I’ve not experienced issues with snakes, fire ants, or uneven ground. It doesn’t cause aero drag or increase your vehicle’s center of gravity, and you can bring it along on a bike ride or a hike. I’ve paid less for fully-functional vehicles than what some of these roof-top tents cost. The novelty might be fun for one night, but I just don’t see it as a very practical alternative.

  2. smalleyxb122 Avatar

    I have an iKamper Skycamp, which I got as one of their backers when they were on Kickstarter. If I had it to do over again, I probably wouldn’t have bought the annex. It’s far more cumbersome to set up than the tent itself, and as a result I have only used it once. I am a bit shocked to see how much they are asking on their website. Nearly $4k is a lot of money for a tent. I paid less as a Kickstarter backer.

    It offers the room of the “book-style” Smittybilt, and the insulation and nearly the ease of setup as the Roofnest. I have slept in it in high winds. With the included strut locks, and oriented so the hard shell faces the gusts, it was fine.

    I have no affiliation beyond being a satisfied customer. I’m not sure I could justify $3,900 for it, but it’s not like I could justify what I paid, either. It’s an extravagance, and I was glad I had it when I was camping during a record-breaking rainstorm (>4in overnight).

  3. SlowJoeCrow Avatar

    Based on the number of “overlander” vehicles in my neighborhood the cynic in me sees a good potential market for fake roof top tents and maybe even plastic Hi Lift jacks so your Subaru can have the look without the weight and expense. Of course the fake tent doesn’t have to be entirely useless since it can serve as a cargo box for skis, fishing rods, or photographic backdrops for your Instagram “adventures”.

  4. SlowJoeCrow Avatar

    Based on the number of “overlander” vehicles in my neighborhood the cynic in me sees a good potential market for fake roof top tents and maybe even plastic Hi Lift jacks so your Subaru can have the look without the weight and expense. Of course the fake tent doesn’t have to be entirely useless since it can serve as a cargo box for skis, fishing rods, or photographic backdrops for your Instagram “adventures”.

%d bloggers like this: