McLaren-Elva

The News for November 15th, 2019

Welcome to the Hooniverse News! As always, this is a weekly recap of the biggest stories in the automotive industry without the fluff or bull. This week, Ferrari stuns with the jaw-dropping Roma, McLaren pays homage to 60s sports cars with roofless and windowless Elva supercar, Peugeot is coming back to the WEC with a “hypercar” entry, Kia shows off the new K5 in South Korea as an Optima preview, Ford is calling their electric SUV the Mustang Mach-E, and your automotive news.

Ferrari Roma

ferrari roma

It’s always a great day when I get to write about a Ferrari that I don’t immediately hate. Ferrari has pulled the wraps off the Roma, a “2+” coupe with stunning looks and the performance to back it up. Ferrari calls it a “2+” coupe in reference to the extra space behind the front seats for luggage. Better that than two useless back seats.

There are very limited details available but we know it’s built on the bones of the Portofino (the convertible that replaced the California) but replaces the folding hardtop with a beautiful fastback. A major thing it also replaces from the Portofino is the dog shit styling. This Roma is one of the most attractive cars Ferrari has put out in years…. funny, I’ve been saying that about quite a few Ferraris lately. Is there hope? For the past few years, Ferrari subscribed to the philosophy that supercars have to draw your attention with outrageous styling and unnecessary flare. With the Roma, Ferrari is going back to a time when supercars – particularly Ferraris – caught your eyes just by being pleasing to the eyes.

ferrari romaferrari roma

The only technical details we have so far are fortunately the ones that matter most. It’s powered by a 3.9-liter turbocharged V8 that’s front-midmounted. 611 horsepower and 561 lb.-ft. of torque are on tap and it’s channeled to the rear wheels through an eight-speed DCT. With a dry weight of 3,245 pounds and the quickest gearbox in their arsenal, it sprints to 60 mph in 3.4 seconds, will reach 124 mph in 9.3 seconds, and won’t stop going till around 200 mph.

ferrari roma

Ferrari will start showing more of it in the coming months but I’ve already seen enough to know I love it. No pricing yet but you probably don’t want to know.

[Source: Ferrari via Autoweek]

McLaren Elva

McLaren-Elva

Open-cockpit supercars are all the rage apparently and McLaren wanted in. They’re coming out with a limited run of the Elva, a roofless and windowless addition to the McLaren Ultimate Series. The name comes from the McLaren-Elva race cars of the late 60s that were customer racing versions of the mighty Group 7 McLaren race cars. It was the proper name for a car that looks to recapture some of the magic of those old open-top monsters.

The modern-day Elva features a completely bespoke carbon fiber chassis and body but some hardware that’s borrowed from another serious track weapon. Sitting just behind the driver’s head is a 4.0-liter twin-turbocharged V8 from the same family of engines that powers the McLaren Senna and Senna GTR. In this application it produces 804 horsepower and its job is made significantly easier thanks to the car’s weight, which McLaren says is the lightest of any road car they’ve built (numbers are still being validated). 0-62 mph takes under three seconds, 0-124 mph is 6.7 seconds (which is quicker than the Senna), and every sense is heightened by having the driver out in the elements.

mclaren elsa

Just because there’s no windows or roof doesn’t mean it has to be uncomfortable though. McLaren developed a world-first “Active Air Management System” which channels air through the nose to come out of the front clamshell at high velocity ahead of the occupants. This directs air up over the cockpit to create a “relative bubble of calm”. Various intakes and wind deflectors work the air as speeds increase. Those who really want one can opt for a fixed windscreen, but why would you? Helmets are recommended but not necessary according to McLaren. The upper cabin’s form and sculpture wraps around the driver and passenger to provide a secure environment. Pop-up rollover protection is included as well.

McLaren-Elva

Despite being an open-air supercar with serious track performance capabilities, the Elva is homologated for all major markets. Only 399 are being built and prices start at $1.69 million.

[Source: McLaren]

Peugeot Coming Back to WEC

poojoe

The formidable Peugeot 908 and Peugeot’s endurance program ran its last WEC race in 2011. Before Toyota and Porsche rejoined to spar for the LMP1 crown, Peugeot was the only one who would hang with Audi as they dominated Le Mans and other big races. This week, Peugeot surprised us all with a tweet that they were back and ready to join the “Hypercar” class in the WEC in 2022. No other details have been provided but they say we’ll know more at the beginning of 2020. Peugeot joins Aston Martin, Toyota, and Scuderia Cameron Glickenhaus as the first few confirmed manufacturers in the new top class in the FIA World Endurance Championship. We’ll take them any way we can. Peugeot belongs in endurance racing. Of course now that they’re merging with Fiat Chrysler, I’m worried that they’ll just quit as soon as they start winning.

[Source: Twitter]

Kia Previews New Optima With K5

kia k5

Following up from an earlier teaser shot, Kia revealed images of the all-new K5 in South Korea which is essentially what the Optima will be in the US. There aren’t many details and any hardware specs would likely be somewhat different for the US anyway, but it’s safe to say the new Optima will at least look close to this. It’s striking to say the very least and looks to have take some inspiration from the Stinger with more athletic lines and a fastback-style roofline. I like it. More info will be available when it goes on sale in South Korea next month. I’ll probably forget about it and won’t cover this again until the Optima is revealed in America.

[Source: Kia via Autoweek]

Ford Names Their Mustang-Inspired Electric Crossover

Mustang Mach E

Ford has been making a lot of buzz about their first all-electric performance vehicle, a crossover that is reportedly heavily inspired by the Mustang. As some spy shots have indicated, it takes a fair bit of usual Mustang styling as its own and will be a properly quick crossover thing. Turns out the looks and relative performance aren’t the only things it’s taking from the Mustang. It’s also taking the name.

Ford is officially calling it the Mustang Mach-E. I guess that means the Mustang is a family that’s open to more than just two-door sports cars now. The Mach-E name though is something I can totally get behind. It’s being revealed to the world this Sunday the 17th at 9:00 PM Eastern on a live broadcast with actor and man who needs to stop getting shitty roles in shitty movies, Idris Elba. I of course do not include his role in Pacific Rim in that statement. Ford will start taking deposits for it immediately after the broadcast at Ford.com.

From the time this article gets posted, you have 56 hours to enjoy a world where a Mustang crossover hasn’t become a thing yet. I’m enjoying my 56 hours by driving my real Mustang to Daytona.

[Source: Ford]

What’s your automotive news?

hooniverse

That’s all I’ve got for you this week, so now it’s your turn. If you saw anything, fixed something, broke everything, or otherwise did anything even remotely car related that you want to share with your fellow hoon, sound off in the comments.

Have a good weekend.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

52 responses to “The News for November 15th, 2019”

  1. Zentropy Avatar
    Zentropy

    The “Mach-E auto” sounds like some overpriced Starbucks drink my wife would order. I think Ford’s marketing department can do better than that.

    1. outback_ute Avatar
      outback_ute

      Ford’s marketing department?

      1. Zentropy Avatar
        Zentropy

        Isn’t that who would be in charge of product naming?

        1. Batshitbox Avatar
          Batshitbox

          Ford’s marketing-what?
          Ford’s what-department?
          Ford’s what-what?

          1. nanoop Avatar

            I kept using that reference since ~2000, and only got clueless stares, over and over again. Those are not tears in my eyes, no.

            Edit: I wrote “2008”, but I’m actually old enough to have watched the first screening.

          2. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            I remain clueless on this one. Glad you guys are enjoying it, though!

          3. nanoop Avatar

            A Futurama reference, to one of the first episodes. I figure Futurama is old enough to be an obscure interest by today.

          4. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            Ok, that explains it– I never watched Futurama, despite certainly being old enough to remember it. Surprisingly, I’ve never watched an episode of The Simpsons, either. Or South Park, for that matter. A lot of pop culture references go over my head completely.

          5. Fuhrman16 Avatar
            Fuhrman16

            In the Futurama episode “I,Roommate” Fry moves in to Bender the robot’s apartment. While there Fry asks Bender if he can use the bathroom. Bender replies “Bath-what? What-room? What-what?”

        2. outback_ute Avatar
          outback_ute

          Maybe their US one is better, I hope so

  2. GTXcellent Avatar
    GTXcellent

    Not automotive related, but definitely mechanized transport related. Last weekend I picked up an old Polaris Indy Lite snowmobile for the kids to putt around on. It’s just a 340 twin, so they won’t be able to get themselves into too much trouble. Anyways, the price was very right (free) because it won’t run – and this is where I’m at. Figured it would be a pretty simple job, but no, I’m stuck too. It’s a fuel delivery issue that is beyond my abilities. I can get gas to the fuel pump (by sucking on the fuel line) but nothing more. Took apart the pump and everything looked good there, no leaks, no cracks in the diaphragm, etc. I can get it to run by pouring a little gas in the cylinders, but it will NOT pull more gas. I think it might be an issue with no impulse but I’m at a total loss. I can’t see any cracks in the lines. So, right now it sits in a pile of pieces in the back of the shed. I do have a couple of buddies who spend all work day blowing up motors on the dyno and building them back up, so after deer season I’ll see if they can work some magic.

    1. nanoop Avatar

      How long did it sit? Fuel can become a jelly that’s transparent so injectors and carburettor needles etc. may only look clean…

      1. GTXcellent Avatar
        GTXcellent

        Oh it’s been sitting alright – I’ve cleaned everything the best that I can. I will say that when the previous owner ran it for the last time, he shut off the fuel line and ran it until it quit, so there really shouldn’t be a bad buildup. I don’t dare start disassembling carbs, my skill set is too limited. Hence the need for the guys who actually know what they’re doing.

      2. GTXcellent Avatar
        GTXcellent

        Oh it’s been sitting alright – I’ve cleaned everything the best that I can. I will say that when the previous owner ran it for the last time, he shut off the fuel line and ran it until it quit, so there really shouldn’t be a bad buildup. I don’t dare start disassembling carbs, my skill set is too limited. Hence the need for the guys who actually know what they’re doing.

      3. GTXcellent Avatar
        GTXcellent

        Oh it’s been sitting alright – I’ve cleaned everything the best that I can. I will say that when the previous owner ran it for the last time, he shut off the fuel line and ran it until it quit, so there really shouldn’t be a bad buildup. I don’t dare start disassembling carbs, my skill set is too limited. Hence the need for the guys who actually know what they’re doing.

        1. nanoop Avatar

          “We” (well, you) have done what we could, let’s wait for the cavalry. Good luck, that will be a great entertainment during the winter holidays!

        2. salguod Avatar

          If you can get ID numbers off the carb or fuel pump, you might be able to find a cheap replacement online. After disassembling and cleaning the carb on my cheap snow thrower twice and still not having it run well, I checked online and found the carb for $17.

          Of course, a carb for a ~5 year old Briggs and Stratton engine is one thing. A 20+ year old snowmobile (right?) is another.

  3. Tiller188 Avatar
    Tiller188

    The Roma does look pretty nice (I’m not sure about the sharknose and grille treatment), but it doesn’t immediately say “Ferrari” to me. Maybe that’s more an indictment of the styling of their last generation or so of cars than anything else, but I just don’t see much, other than the wheels and staggered quad exhausts, that makes me think of Ferrari. Instead I see a lot of Aston in the profile and the headlights, and some Porsche in the taillights/that character line along the trunk. On the one hand, it feels like a sad day to me when a Ferrari isn’t immediately recognizable as such, but on the other, if they’re headed back towards simpler, smoother, “prettier” styling, I’ll be rooting for them to make that work as the new family look.

    1. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      I agree, it doesn’t look especially “Ferrari” to me, either, and I consider that a compliment. Ferrari may have built some of the most gorgeous cars in automotive history, but their last 25 years have pretty much sucked, styling-wise. I’ll support any direction they take away from the awkward mechanical goblins they’ve been building lately. [Edit: I do make exception for the F12tdf.]

    2. Sjalabais Avatar
      Sjalabais

      Funny, looking at the photos I thought it’s nice that a heritage carmaker dares to try something new. The only time we have seen this lately was when the big OEMs started out modelling EVs.

      1. Zentropy Avatar
        Zentropy

        I think the problem here is that Ferrari is not trying something new. The Roma may look different compared to what Ferrari has been building, but the Roma is a somewhat derivative design that– as Tiller188 suggests– evokes Aston Martin and Porsche and perhaps a hint of McLaren. It’s neither an evolution of existing Ferrari themes, nor a retro rehash from the brand’s past, nor a completely fresh take on a high-end GT. If it were presented without badging, you wouldn’t know who the hell made it, because while it is attractive, it’s also fairly generic.

        1. Sjalabais Avatar
          Sjalabais

          You’re not wrong, and it is debatable how charismatic the result is. But a GT is always for the conservative crowd. You see it in the press photos, too: No screaming colours, tires or wings. This car exists so that people who don’t want a Ferrari can burn off some money on a Ferrari. I think they know what they are doing.

          1. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            I don’t argue that it’s a smart move. I’m probably part of what you call the “conservative crowd”, because I typically dislike loud colors and wings. Peacock cars aren’t my thing, but then, I can’t afford anything like that regardless. Perhaps if I had money, I’d enjoy showing it off, but I’d much more likely buy many cheap cars rather than a few expensive ones.

  4. mdharrell Avatar

    My news: I’ve now owned my Cycle Burro for three years plus a few days, which means I was finally able to apply for a title earlier this week following the conclusion of Washington’s three-year “ownership in doubt” waiting period, as the trailer came without a title or indeed even a serial number. Such things apparently weren’t all that important for small trailers in the 1970s. It now bears an assigned VIN. This is it in its previous owner’s driveway:

    http://www.singlewheel.com/Scoots/Burro/MehBurro/P1000481.jpg

    I also found out that since 2017 Washington has offered permanent registration for “intermittent-use trailers” with a one-time fee that pays for itself after a few years of ownership, so I went ahead and registered all three of my trailers this way. The guy at the counter asked whether each trailer weighed less than 2000 pounds (a requirement for the permanent registration), which meant I was able to point out that the official scale weights on their registrations showed that all three together only came to a total of 498 pounds. The Cycle Burro was the second heaviest at 85 pounds. Done!

    1. Sjalabais Avatar
      Sjalabais

      Gotta love how the trailer top gently says: “I’m a spoiler, too”.

      1. mdharrell Avatar

        It’s a pretty cool feature, so of course it was eliminated on the later versions:

        http://www.singlewheel.com/Scoots/Burro/BurroCBear/5.jpg

        1. Vairship Avatar
          Vairship

          Ah, but now it has a pillion seat!

        2. outback_ute Avatar
          outback_ute

          On the other hand it looks like they would have space for an extra sandwich!

  5. nanoop Avatar

    Vivaro still with CEL/airbag lamp, next try next week, sigh.

    On other news, I’m trying to reduce my internet consumption on the phone. Considering to buy a Nokia 8110 (can do WhatsApp but not much more), and I’m wearing a watch again now.

    The watch thing somewhat backfired, let me explain.

    I stopped wearing watches because I lived in Dresden, Germany, where you could hear the Incabloc chatter when riding a bicycle over cobbled stone roads, and I was working on optical tables, where reflective, edged things on your wrist are a no-no. So I stopped wearing one.
    Ten years later, the only good watch I had had become too nice to be worn daily, so I wanted to get a cheap automatic. Most men would just browse the internet, but as a car guy I listened to Matt Farah’s Watch and Listen podcast episode on modding Seiko SK007s. Intrigued (and convinced that I am now old enough to pull off a diver watch) I digged deeper, and true to my attitude to cars (“that’s not a real Porsche”) I found a “that’s not a real watch brand” watch (Invicta. in car world terms, the brand seems to get a lot of fire from 911 owners, but they make fun 924s and, well, donks from Trabants). Their Pro Diver can be modded easily, and when I fail, the investment is below USD100, plus some USD50 in tools from China.
    I now spend much time in the interwebs, looking for inspiration and parts. Does anybody know how to print/etch my own designs onto aluminium bezels?

    1. Sjalabais Avatar
      Sjalabais

      I see how no-phone, presumably to focus less on the virtual life, ironically created a need for more research…online. Laudable idea though. I put away my phone for hours at a time and, almost without fail, will receive perplexed follow-up mails and messages on why I am not available right there and then.

      1. Smaglik Avatar
        Smaglik

        Best day of the week is when you forgot your phone at home…

        1. outback_ute Avatar
          outback_ute

          I thought I did on Thursday, and actually did on Friday… at least it didn’t take long to go back and get it. Lesson is pay more attention when you change your routine.

      1. nanoop Avatar

        The rabbit hole of watches offered a rabbit hole of modding offered a rabbit hole of etching/surface treatment…

        Biggest challenge will be to find the materials here. I’m sure the stuff exists here, too, but probably under different brands and names. Once identified, I can browse the Internet for hours in order to find the best deals….

        Thank you!

        1. nanoop Avatar

          The magic word seems to be “toner transfer”: laser-print onto a semi-glossy page of an (already printed) catalog, and iron(!) it onto the object to etch. The German makers even recommend a certain company’s catalog (Reichelt, a distributor for electronics)… Etch as your would, and the toner-fied area is masked and hence, remains. Spray-paint, dry, and polish off excess paint and the toner. Since this is a new hobby to me: be patient with me, I’ll have to tackle the christmas season first.

    2. Tiller188 Avatar
      Tiller188

      I know nothing about modding them, but I’m happy to see someone else enjoying an Invicta take on a classic look (my go-to watch is currently an Invicta Speedway).

  6. salguod Avatar

    Last weekend I did the “02_pilot mod” (vacuum line added to the CCV) on the BMW to, hopefully, curb its oil consumption. Monday and Tuesday were snowy so I drove the Ranger to keep the BMW out of the salt. Wednesday it wouldn’t start. I got it started last night, but decided to leave it sit until the weekend. I either left a vacuum line or cap off or failed to plug in a connector.

    1. gerberbaby Avatar

      Let us know the results. I need to dig into my e46 to correct a coolant leak presumably with the 2 coolant lines under the intake. So that would be the time to update my CCV and do the 02 pilot mod as well. My oil consumption is only bad at consistent high rpms. Especially after last years manual swap. Now I’m at 3800 rpm at 80mph. But it makes for great fun around town.

      1. salguod Avatar

        I updated the CCV in January to the BMW cold weather parts after it froze and blew the VCG. Since then I’ve been using about a quart every 400 miles or so. I replaced the VCG this summer which had almost no effect on consumption, unsurprisingly. I only had the car a few weeks when the CCV froze, so I really didn’t have a base line of what the oil consumption was before. I’m not expecting a cure, but if I can get up to 1,500 miles to the quart or so I’ll be happy.

        I’ve now got a rough idle and hard start problem I didn’t have before. I rechecked connections and all seems fine. The large vacuum cap on the rear of the manifold is cracked and loose fitting, I’m wondering if I now have a vacuum leak there from messing with it. Replacing that cap is an easy and cheap test.

        3800 RPM at 80 MPH seems about what I see on my ’02 325Ci Coupe with the 5 speed. I tend to drive it fairly aggressively most times, so that may explain my high oil consumption too.

        I’m curious what E46 you have?

        1. gerberbaby Avatar

          I’ve seen that large rubber cap too all cracked up, so its definitely a good place to start. I have an 02 325ci convertible with 210k. and the 5 speed now. The only time I really see consumption is long highway drives at high speed. so, I’m not in a hurry to rebuild the top end. Since I need to pull the intake for the coolant leak, (as long as I’m in there) I will do the CCV. and try the mod right away. Maybe it’ll cure the high rpm oil use. do you know the signs that the Disa valve is going bad or should be replaced?

          1. salguod Avatar

            Sounds like essentially the same car, aside from the folding roof. I’m closing in on 170K. It was a one owner, well loved car with 155K when I bought it in January with almost exclusively dealer service on the CarFax. Very clean, little rust and nothing catastrophic. Until this week, my commute was long, 50-60 minutes each way, largely freeway, so that might explain my abnormally high consumption.

            I don’t know anything about the Disa valve, sorry.

          2. gerberbaby Avatar

            A BMW mechanic told me when they break, the pivot pin can enter the intake and eventually get sucked into the cylinders damaging the walls. Just in case you were running out of things to worry about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQi7-1swqNA

          3. salguod Avatar

            I had heard that before. I’ve had mine off twice now and it looked pretty good. Pin was secure, seals looked OK but I didn’t know about how to test it. I’ve got no codes so I’m not worried about it.

  7. Maymar Avatar
    Maymar

    I’m indifferent to the Mach-E, but the specs and pricing announced elsewhere ($44-60ish k, ~250-300 miles range, 0-60 in mid-3 to mid 5 seconds) are actually pretty decent (looks like it stacks up well against something like a BMW X4, just to compare to another SUV coupe…thing). It still looks bloated (as all SUV Coupe..things do), but could lead to better things later?

    Since I have no plans or aspirations to own one, I’m pleased with the Roma, and am just glad it exists, as more reasonably tasteful GT’s are a good thing.

    1. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      Very relevant points on the Mach-E. For many of us, the eventual evolution of all of this is what is most important, not necessarily the awkward steps getting there.

  8. Sjalabais Avatar
    Sjalabais

    Not sure if this post here is set to public – https://m.facebook.com/kjell.nilsen.71/posts/pcb.10156332369366008 – but a guy crashed into a moose with this Avensis and has video and photos. The aftermath looks horrible, but everyone is, miraculously, ok. A Swedish engineer working with crash tests at Volvo for 18 years reminds the group that they’re the only ones testing for this kind of collision. He even mentions a Tesla failing in a moose collision, and digs up this old ad – there are no moose in Japan:

    https://i.ibb.co/Yf61599/76773253-10212390407194578-2068738523594227712-n.jpg

  9. Sjalabais Avatar
    Sjalabais

    Not sure if this post here is set to public – https://m.facebook.com/kjell.nilsen.71/posts/pcb.10156332369366008 – but a guy crashed into a moose with this Avensis and has video and photos. The aftermath looks horrible, but everyone is, miraculously, ok. A Swedish engineer working with crash tests at Volvo for 18 years reminds the group that they’re the only ones testing for this kind of collision. He even mentions a Tesla failing in a moose collision, and digs up this old ad – there are no moose in Japan:

    https://i.ibb.co/Yf61599/76773253-10212390407194578-2068738523594227712-n.jpg

    1. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      Damn! I suppose given their 1000-lb weight and high center of gravity, a moose is more dangerous to hit than a stationary car. Most of the damage was inflicted on the cabin, not the typical frontal crush zone. Glad everyone is ok.

    2. nanoop Avatar

      And as you can see, these “1000 meter high beams” do nothing, because the moose ran into the lane from a large angle with tens of kph, instead of standing around on the road waiting for the impact.

      1. outback_ute Avatar
        outback_ute

        It looked like the moose was barely moving, as its backside only obscured the oncoming car’s headlights at the last minute. Very unfortunate spot being around a bend after the lights were already dipped.

        I hit a roo years ago just after a slight bend, which may have been the roo trying to get out of the headlight beam and choosing the wrong direction to go. Glad it wasn’t a moose!

        On the plus side the spotlights are ok to be put on the next car?

        They have pretty well covered divided rural highways with wire rope barriers here, but I prefer the previous option of having ‘lightweight’ shrubbery in the median which allowed use of high beams, but I suppose didn’t always stop errant trucks. Hopefully they will add that back.