The first-gen Acura NSX on a private track is an automotive Ouija board

Over the course of his life, Philip Marks acquired a love of fast cars. While building up his business empire, alongside his father, brothers, and eventually his sons, Marks did well and sought out the machinery that intrigued him. His automotive tastes ranged from powerful muscle cars to the occasional German sports car and a handful of Japanese treats. He didn’t just like keeping them clean in his garages though, as Philip liked to wind these things out. So when a group wanted to build a country club-style raceway near his home in New Hampshire, Philip didn’t just give a thumbs up he wrote a large check to help the place go from renders to reality.

Nestled in the beautiful tree-lined hills of Tamworth, New Hampshire, Club Motorsports is 2.5 miles of perfectly placed tarmac. It unfolds by way fo 15 turns and through 250 feet of elevation change. It’s challenging, fast, and shit loads of fun. When automotive journalist Jason Cammisa visited for a Motor Trend video feature, he called it the best track in America. And after I’ve had a chance to drive it, I can see exactly what Jason is talking about.

Philip got his chance to check out the track, but he never enjoyed it as much as he would’ve liked. Cancer can come in hard and fast. And even though Philip was a stubborn bastard when he wanted to be, cancer puts up an unfair fight. Philip died in September of 2017, aged just 65 years. Before he passed, he worked to sell off a large portion of his car collection. He didn’t sell all of it though, and his sons (who are close friends) allowed me to grab the keys to a fantastic machine.

This 1996 Acura NSX is the second NSX that Philip owned. Many years prior, he had one, sold it, and regretted it. So he found another, and I don’t believe this one is going anywhere anytime soon. It shows just 34,000 miles on its odometer and it was practically begging me to get it out into the sun.

Well, maybe not begging. It put up a little fight due to a dead battery. After some time on a mechanic-grade charger, the 270-horsepower 3.0-liter V6 fired to life. I slotted the tight shift lever into first and eased the NSX out of the garage. Once in the sun, I let it idle for a bit to help fill that battery back up. I couldn’t wait for long though, because I had a date with the race track.

The drive to the track was wonderful. Along the way, I checked the action of the clutch and brakes. Prior to setting off, I gave the tires a once over. All is well and the NSX is eager to roam. And this is a version of the car I’d been trying to drive for a few years. This model does not have power steering. It’s the purest expression of first-gen NSX and I’ve been hunting down a drive in one like this for some time. And I’m happy to report it’s everything you’d hope it would be.

When I arrive at the track, I inform the person at the gate that I’m a guest of Brian and Paul Marks. The man smiles and directs me up to the main office. There I’m given a “novice” wristband and informed that the track will open soon. Club members and more experienced drivers are going out in the first session. One of those members recognized me from a video I shot and informs me he bought his Camaro ZL1 because of said video. I’m honored, and even happier when the driver offers to take me around the course in said car so I can get a look at the track before my own session.

This is always a gamble because you don’t know how someone drives just by chatting with them. This dude knows his car and this track though, and he was both fast and smooth. And he provided great insight into the many twists and turns at Club Motorsports. “This is where the Porsche guys setup, but I prefer this line…

Club Motorsports is still being built up. The clubhouse is in development and “Garage Mahals” will take shape as well. As it stands now though, it’s an absolute piece of driving heaven. There’s enough of a challenge you want to keep coming back for more. After two sessions, I was beginning to piece the line together but there are still many areas that keep you guessing. “Can I get through this part faster? Should I be over here more? I can take that corner far quicker…

But I wasn’t that worried about my lap times on this day. Instead, I was paying my respects in a way. Philip was a sort of second father for a period of my life when I was younger. I have a great relationship with my father, but Philip was there for me too if I needed him. Additionally, I tagged along with him on occasional trips to Mecum auction events to help him sort through the field and find some gems for his collection.

Driving his Acura NSX at the track he helped build definitely wasn’t a “goodbye” type day. In fact, it felt like the opposite. I was thinking of him and I got to say hello. The sounds of engines and tires on a race track are music to the ears of a certain group of people. Philip was one of those people, and I think he was listening in

…maybe even cringing slightly at some minor clutch smell during my first session. Sorry Phil. I got better as the day went on, I promise.

Thanks to my friends Paul and Brian for letting my drive the car, and thanks to Club Motorsports for letting me loose on your wonderful track!

[Photos copyright 2019 Hooniverse/Jeff Glucker]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

16 responses to “The first-gen Acura NSX on a private track is an automotive Ouija board”

  1. Zentropy Avatar
    Zentropy

    Good story (sorry about your friend Philip) on a great track in a great car. After all these years, the original NSX stubbornly still remains on my “must drive” bucket list.

    I had no idea you could get an NSX with manual steering, but that’s a “delete” option I wish was available on modern vehicles. The only time I don’t prefer it is when parallel parking or in three-point turns– otherwise, in my experience it provides much more feedback to the driver. With the exception of some 80s-era BMWs, most of the power steering systems I’ve experienced have been the automotive equivalent of an extra-durable condom.

    1. Ed Byrne Avatar
      Ed Byrne

      91-94 manual NSXes had no power steering. 95+ manual (including the 96 in this article) and all automatics came with power steering, with the exception of a few special editions (Zanardi, Type R, etc). The power steering system used is unique in that it’s electrically assisted, but only up to 25mph, above 25mph there is no assist, so it feels the same as a manual rack.

    2. outback_ute Avatar
      outback_ute

      An unstated reminder that you have the success and the toys but cancer doesn’t discriminate, guys take the tests and get anything checked out. Too many stories of people dying because they didn’t.

      Modern steering geometry and ratios are not compatible with manual steering, one more reason to stick to old cars.

      1. Zentropy Avatar
        Zentropy

        I disagree on the geometry. A manual rack-and-pinion steering setup differs from a power one only in the lack of a pump, reservoir, piston, and valve. Otherwise, the basic structure is the same. If anything, a manual should be easier to fit than a power setup, because it takes up far less room under the hood. In an age when every mpg counts, I’m surprised it hasn’t been reintroduced to more models, but I understand that the average driver (especially in the city) might not like the extra effort required at low speeds.

        As for ratios, the Alfa Romeo 4C isn’t even offered with power steering. It has a 15.7:1 ratio, which is on-par with a (power-steering) Mazda MX-5’s 15.5:1. Quick, light, communicative. I don’t see a problem here.

        My ’66 Mercury has manual steering that I think is (glacially slow) 22:1, and I don’t find it cumbersome at all, though it is a bit of a workout when parking (not for effort, but number of turns). I wouldn’t want to race it on a road course, but for regular driving it’s fine, and it gives much better feedback than the power steering in my ’67 Mercury. The recirculating-ball setup in both sucks for on-center feel, though. Rack and pinion is much better.

        1. David Lombana Avatar
          David Lombana

          Try parking that same 4C in the city or on a hill though. While in motion it’s wonderful. From a stop…it’s a bit annoying probably a bit more than the Mercury if you add its lack of visibility and rather interesting clutch engagement (it almost feels like you’re waiting for it to bite like in a manual), you can see why something like a Cayman outsells it. Even if I’d be the first to admit I like the 4C far more for its sense of occasion.

          1. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            I dailied my Merc as a teen and young adult, and the street in front of my college dorm had a 16% grade. My car is a three-on-the-tree, 390 big block, with a clutch so stiff I could have probably successfully modeled hiking boots for REI, at least with my left leg. The brakes, too, are manual, and I always kept the parking brake cable religiously well-maintained. The little Alfa is nearly 4 feet shorter, and in comparison, would be like parking a shopping cart, even with its huge blind spots.
            So, I wasn’t championing the 4C– in fact, I wouldn’t take one if you gave it to me. I only offered it as an example of non-power steering with a contemporary ratio. The Cayman’s sales figures are absolutely justified, as it’s a better car in almost every way. Too bad it doesn’t have manual steering, though.

        2. outback_ute Avatar
          outback_ute

          Yes the rack is the same but camber and caster are the geometry I was meaning. Taking away the assistance eg if the engine shuts off usually leads to people saying their steering locked up. I experienced it once turning into my driveway, it needed a lot of effort to get the nose around and not hit the fence (it was uphill so I used to go in a bit hot if clear).

          The Alfa 4C would have less weight on the nose being mid-engined; Imps have about the same ratio and you can turn the wheel with one finger.. Note the Giulia has 11.8:1 ratio and Giulietta 12.5, so they have backed it off for the 4C manual steering despite the similarity to the MX5.

          22:1 ratio must be 5-6 turns lock to lock; no thanks. Last manual steering I drove was a Falcon GT with 16:1 box, obviously heavy if trying to turn the wheels when stationary and I wouldn’t like to daily drive it in the inner city or where regular parallel parking is needed.

          1. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            Yep… nearly 6 turns, IIRC. That was Ford’s ratio for intermediate-to-large cars and trucks with manual steering, where the added leverage was needed for the higher weight. Lighter Mustangs were in the teens, I think, providing quicker response. For a street-driven car, it wasn’t nearly as bad as it sounds. It actually provided very precise adjustment of the front wheels– you just couldn’t do it as quickly. Honestly, I think on more than one occasion it actually saved me from oversteering after dropping onto the shoulder. The car tended to be a bit tail-happy anyway.
            Also, keep in mind that manual steering is considerably easier than power steering when the engine stops. When your power steering pump isn’t running, you’re not just trying to turn the wheels, you’re also pushing fluid in that cylinder that is normally pumped to assist the turn, but now is working against you. That, and power steering setups get by with a lower ratio anyway, which gives less leverage. Manual steering at a dead stop is more resistant than at speed, but not what I would call difficult. Power steering at a stop with no engine power is for some people almost un-turnable.

    3. Ed Byrne Avatar
      Ed Byrne

      91-94 manual NSXes had no power steering. 95+ manual (including the 96 in this article) and all automatics came with power steering, with the exception of a few special editions (Zanardi, Type R, etc). The power steering system used is unique in that it’s electrically assisted, but only up to 25mph, above 25mph there is no assist, so it feels the same as a manual rack.

      1. David Lombana Avatar
        David Lombana

        Thanks for the trivia! Didn’t know that bit. It almost feels like this should have been a no brainer approach for all cars presented as the ‘purist’ choice these days.

        1. outback_ute Avatar
          outback_ute

          There are quite a few that have speed-related variable assistance, however I’d think most have the ‘cut-out’ speed a fair bit higher.

      2. Zentropy Avatar
        Zentropy

        Interesting… I had no idea electrically-assisted steering was introduced on production cars that early.

      3. Jeff Glucker Avatar
        Jeff Glucker

        Well… shit! I did not know that.

  2. Jeff Glucker Avatar
    Jeff Glucker

    Forgot to mention in the article… Club Motorsports named a corner after Philip, which is pretty cool. Turn 8. At some point, there will be something put up at that corner commemorating it as such.

  3. Steven Casco Avatar
    Steven Casco

    Here’s a once around video in MP4 format. Once Jeff got out of the car, I went a lot faster : )

    https://1drv.ms/v/s!AjDrkSsJDbccgn8IB2uLiUbvz3nR?e=I2kRpb

    1. Jeff Glucker Avatar
      Jeff Glucker

      Revisited this article because we were just talking all things NSX in our Slack, and I just found this comment that I didn’t see prior – Thanks for sharing the video!