The Carchive: The '79 Volvo 260 Range

IMAG4439
As we put another tiring, prickly week behind us, let’s take a quick break from all that is new and surprising in the world and relax with something old and familar. Join me  as I squint at today’s ever so slightly out of focus document from The Carchive.
After last week’s look at a Triumph of British engineering, we’re heading across the North Sea and making land in Sweden, with a printed look at 1979’s Volvo 260 range.

IMAG4441
“The “VOLVO VIRTUES”- Quality, reliability and safety- are world renowned. The Volvo 260 series cars embody all these virtues whilst offering unrivalled standard luxury specifications”
Of the two most famous Swedish car makers, Volvo and Saab were cut from the same cloth. Both were equally Scandinavian in their stubborn refusal to move from their own, proven ways of doing things, it’s just that Saab were generally a little more trippy and psychedelic in their approach.
It was probably the 100 and its descendent the 200 series which earned the company’s reputation for building the boxiest of bricks on wheels, a rep which was galvanised by the 700 which was squarer than an actual square.
IMAG4444
This brochure is actually a fairly recent induction to The Carchive, bought from eBay on the strength of its cover alone, and a sense of hope as to what it contained. I was filled with glee, then, when I found it to document the entirety of the 260 range at a time when it was more diverse than ever before.
Nigh on five decades after this shape went on sale, the fitness-for purpose and integrity of design in the 260 becomes ever more refreshing to look at. Though there are seemingly no concessions to “style” as such, the whole is enduring in the same way as the IKEA Billy bookcase.
Things are the same inside, with logic and ease-of-use being the core design objectives. I reckon it’s only familiarity and association that has caused the interior to date, but then a Cheddar cheese sandwich is pretty unimaginative but will never be any the less delicious for that.
IMAG4442
“There will be less than two hundred 262 coupés built for the UK this year…..offering exclusive styling and finish”
On the basis of all this sensibleness, the Bertone-built (but Volvo designed) 262c was a wholly unexpected arrival, with its wildly raked windscreen and a wheelhouse that seemed completely at odds with the rest of the hull. Totally distinctive, though, and with more than enough upmarket interior touches to cement its position at the top of the 260 tree.
“The Volvo 260 series is powered by a reliable and responsive 2.7 litre V6 fuel injected engine. The block and the cylinder head are light alloy; there is also a transisoried ignition system that eliminates conventional points and ensures excellent starting and increased engine efficiency”
Mechanically, the six-cylinder 260 series was, ironically, at a disadvantage compared to its technically “lesser” 240 sisters. The B20 four and its evolutions were sidelined in favour of the legendary PRV V6, 2.7 litres big and 148hp strong in this application.
It was the pursuit of prestige that saw this engine being adopted by Malmo, and just a few years later the six cylinder 200 models would be displaced by the 700, a car with North American sales as its primary target. Meanwhile the hardy, proven 240 survived until the early 90s, for some people the ultimate expression of Volvonese.
IMAG4446
“The latest figures from the Swedish Motor Vehicle testing Authority indicate that the life expectancy of a Volvo is 16.7 years. This is longer than any other car”
Sadly, 16.7 years after this brochure was published I’ll wager that, in proportion to those actually sold, the attrition rate of the PRV was rather hiher than the B20 powered machines. Simplicity and ease or cheapness of maintenance are key to the survival of a car when it depreciates to a certain level.
Today, Volvo’s reputation for boxiness has been left behind somewhat, which is probably a good thing. Unfortunately, for any of us who might consider home maintenance of a current S6o in 16.7 years time, the time of the simple Volvo is well and truly in the past.
(All images are of original manufacturer publicity material, photographed by me in very poor light in the back of my car during lunchbreak. Copyright remains property of Volvo. Worrying, isn’t it, that future generations might not know what a TurboBrick is)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

  1. Sjalabais Avatar
    Sjalabais

    Strangely, the first 260-Volvo I was confronted with as a boy, is not part of the selection above:
    http://pics.imcdb.org/0is375/volvo264te7512nb7.3764.jpg
    I used to have a complete collection of all Volvo brochures 1992-2000, but gave it away in a moment of weakness. Should have had the heavy lot shipped to the UK, with some foresight, to preserve it for the lunch-break-expecting masses.
    It was the pursuit of prestige that saw this engine being adopted by Malmo
    Gothenburg?

    1. Rust-MyEnemy Avatar

      One of many errors carefully embedded into the text. Any accuracies there are will stand out like a sore thumb.

      1. Sjalabais Avatar
        Sjalabais

        Sort of a week late, I’d like to share the go-to-site for 240 brochures:
        http://www.volvotips.com/index.php/240-260/volvo-240-260-brochures/
        I assumed this was well-known, but upon further contemplation, it might just be well-known among a somewhat peculiar subset of hoons.

  2. I_Borgward Avatar
    I_Borgward

    Even in the Pacific NW (where you can’t throw a meatball without hitting a 200 series), the PRV V6 is a rare duck, due to most of them being quite dead ducks. You can almost find as many of the diesel models as you can the PRV these days. Even the 262 coupes you find out in the wild have largely been converted to 4 cylinders.
    Meanwhile: You don’t buy a red block, you rent it.

    1. mdharrell Avatar

      I know the feeling. I never see any other Renault C-engined Volvos here in the PNW, either.

  3. Fuhrman16 Avatar
    Fuhrman16

    Do you think these would have done better in the long run if Volvo had stuck with the 3.0L B series straight six that they used in the earlier 164s?

    1. dead_elvis Avatar
      dead_elvis

      Possibly, but these were pretty spendy back in their day. That straight six wasn’t especially great, and pretty thirsty for what it did, and there’s still that bizzaro world styling to overcome. I don’t think things would have turned out too differently.

      1. Sjalabais Avatar
        Sjalabais

        I agree, that engine wasn’t particularly luxurious either – a slog of an i6. The accelerator that hardened 50% half way through, to remind people not to rush it, was strange, too. Volvo was always best building reliable, torquey i4’s.
        But what if the original V8 had been realized? The PRV8? I’ve never thought about it, but maybe it would have found more customers in the US at least?

  4. wunno sev Avatar
    wunno sev

    to be fair, i think the 16.7 years figure is probably still applicable. that’s the expected time for the car to expire, not the “average age” so often cited in many other older volvo ads. it’s 2016 and my ’99 V70’s contemporaries are pretty much hitting the end of their lives. i can see the same happening to early S60s soon. i don’t doubt that 2031 is a good best-before date for current S60s.

    1. Sjalabais Avatar
      Sjalabais

      There’s excellent data on this available freely in Norway, for 331 car makes? I’m on the phone, but this link should work to play around with:
      https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/selectvarval/Define.asp?subjectcode=&ProductId=&MainTable=Bilvrak1b&nvl=&PLanguage=1&nyTmpVar=true&CMSSubjectArea=transport-og-reiseliv&KortNavnWeb=bilreg&StatVariant=&checked=true

      1. wunno sev Avatar
        wunno sev

        check this out homie. on the face of it, the data seem to confirm my hypothesis: the number of Volvos under 15 years of age being scrapped is more or less steady. this is uncorrected for the number of Volvos being sold, mind you. 15 being pretty close to 16.7, i think a modern Volvo would last that long without too much trouble.
        but the number of very old Volvos being scrapped drops with time, suggesting that the durability of Volvos has been in decline since at least the late ’80s. the number of very old Volvos (20+) being scrapped has been in decline since 2007, the oldest data available. don’t know what happened in 2011. cash for clunkers-type program? economic recovery?
        meanwhile, there has been a steady increase in the number of 16-20-year-old Volvos being junked, suggesting that from the 850 generation on, the cars have been less durable.
        there is an alternate explanation for this – perhaps there has simply been less incentive to keep very old cars on the road. stricter inspections, cheaper cars, the introduction of the Euro, etc. it’s probably some combination of all these factors, as well as declining durability of Volvos.
        thanks for the link!

        1. Sjalabais Avatar
          Sjalabais

          Oooh, outstanding work, I didn’t see that before now. New cars have definitely become cheaper, and there’s competition from electric cars. Taxation was revised around 2012, resulting in a price jump of the cheapest V70 DRIVe by something like 15%. In addition, RWD Volvos are much more expensive then whatever FWD Volvos would cost approaching, say 15 years of age. That correlates with the strong increase of 16-20 year old Volvos being scraped – this is also when the 850 gained a solid foothold as the people’s car and the 940/S/V90 was axed. There’s a permanent cash-for-clunkers-program in Norway, in effect since 1978 – but it has not been indexed (thus falling in value over time).

    2. gerberbaby Avatar

      My 01 V70 is going strong at 170k miles. I would expect another 5 years in somewhat limited duty before the value becomes less than the mounting issues by then.

  5. tonyola Avatar
    tonyola

    I so much prefer the big-eye square headlights on the Euro Volvos over the fussy US-market lights.

    1. Rust-MyEnemy Avatar

      They look much better on Freightliners…

  6. CruisinTime Avatar
    CruisinTime

    I had a 244 like the one in the picture,it was my favorite car for a long time.

      1. Rust-MyEnemy Avatar

        I’m warming to Volvo 200s on three-spokes, now…

  7. mzszsm Avatar
    mzszsm

    I should have the S60 sold within 4.7 years, phew!