Cars You Should Know: Bristol's 450 Sports Prototype

Image courtesy carblueprints.info

To understate it, Bristols have always been a bit, shall we say, odd. From the BMW-stolenderived inline six to the eccentric styling of their roadgoing contraptions, they’ve always marched to a different drummer. Their appeal lies not in their classical beauty nor in their raw performance, for the simple reason that most Bristols lack either. Where Bristol rightly deserves credit, however, is at the forefront of post-war British innovation. Where their domestic counterparts contented themselves with frumpy traditionalism, Bristol beat alloy into lurid shapes and chased land speed records. One of their finest, and in that great Bristol tradition, most polarizing creations was the 450 Sports Prototype racer, LeMans competitor, recordbreaker, and torch-bearer for windtunnel development.

The 450’s roots lie in an ill-fated attempt to resurrect the hallowed ERA racing brand with a Formula 2 car in the early 1950s. Cursed with an unreliable motor and the failing health of their leader, neo-ERA divested themselves of the project. Bristol was the beneficiary, and the basic geometry of the open-wheeled ERA became the basis of a Bristol factory sports racer program.
Image courtesy slatford.co.uk/

Perhaps another company would have just clothed the oval-section tube chassis in enclosed bodywork and called it a day, and headed off to the pub to dissipate leftover energy on downing pints. Some components carried over with relatively little change. The ERA’s deDion rear and double-wishbone front suspensions were retained, but the chassis was converted to round tubes. Nestled up front was the familiar Bristol six, in 1971cc form, making a healthy 155 HP. With those conventional bones in place, Bristol invested some serious engineering into the sports racer, dubbed the 450. A rear-mounted transaxle helped with weight distribution. Inboard brakes reduced unsprung mass.
Image courtesy boc.net
And at a time when knock-off spoked wheels were de rigueur, Bristol developed a highly advanced wheel arrangement, with a large central “spider” of cast spokes and five lugs, to which the actual wheel was merely the rim and tire. In some ways this prefaced the multi-piece racing wheel of much later. The hub was incredibly large to allow changement of the driveshafts without removing the wheel or the inboard brakes. And most importantly, the company developed a five-barreled pneumatic lug wrench, which removed all of the lugs quickly and at once. It then retained them within the wrench for quick and precise reattachment. This was light-years ahead of anyone else’s thinking at the time, where lead hammers and single-nut-knockoffs ruled the roost.
Image courtesy www.thoroughbred-cars.com
The most apparent innovation was in the sophisticated, streamlined bodywork fitted to the 450. Bristol was of course mainly an airplane manufacturer, and thus the 450 engineering team had access to the aeronautical wind tunnel. That being said, the initial iteration of the vehicle was awkward at best, with protruding headlights and a shovel-like snout. The rather bizarre enclosed cockpit swept back into a narrow, trailing fastback shape. This initial version ran in anger at the 1953 LeMans race, but both entrants bowed out with trouble early on. After this experience, the Bristol design team wisely decided to do something about the homely and bulbous front end, and smoothed things out by fairing in the driving lamps, with the central pair residing deep within the hood and peering out through a large glassed in section. While it looked odd, it was better and more aerodynamic than the previous iteration. In this second variation, it set several endurance and speed records.
The following year, running minor modifications to the engine, the 450 managed a 1st in class and a 7th overall finish at LeMans, an impressive showing for a repurposed Formula 2 car, although the 450 was really the only competitive can in the 2-liter class that year. The big changes came for 1955, when the 450 got a top-ectomy.
Image courtesy boc.net

The probably apocryphal story is that drivers were sick of the fogging plauging the dreary 1954 season, but it’s more likely that the extra weight of the top didn’t justify the reduction in drag. Whatever the reason, the Bristol sports racer got a much spiffier-looking roadster body, and let us be honest for a moment and say it had a passing resemblance to the contemporary Jaguar LeMans entries. Imitation = flattery, I suppose. Unfortunately, despite promising top speeds in tests, the entire 1955 season was overshadowed by the horrific disaster at LeMans that year, and no one much cared how the contestants fared in a race that most feel should have been discontinued immediately after the accident. With the end of the season, three of the four 450s were scrapped and one, comprised of the best bits of the other 450s, was retained by Tony Crook, the enigmatic chairman of Bristol and a former racer himself. It survives to this day wearing the open bodywork.
Sources: BOC.net, wikipedia ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

  1. P161911 Avatar
    P161911

    The Bristol straight 6 IS the BMW design. The design was taken as war reparations. According to Wikipedia, if anything the Brits stole it from the Americans, since the BMW factory that was the source of the plans was in the American occupation zone.

  2. longrooffan Avatar

    And, appropriately enough, the original body work fits in nicely with Fastback Friday!!

    1. Syrax Avatar
      Syrax

      And in time for Unbelievable Overhang Weekend too!

      1. longrooffan Avatar

        Or in the case of this olelongrooffan, Unbelievable Hangover Weekend! Getting started on it as I sit here!

  3. Jim-Bob Avatar
    Jim-Bob

    What I find funny about Bristol is that they absolutely refuse to even let James May test drive one of their cars, let alone buy one due to a comment made by Jeremy Clarkson. I mean, he seems like the perfect customer for them. No matter because they have just gone broke.

    1. facelvega Avatar
      facelvega

      I guess selling cars that last as long as their owners and refusing to advertise isn't the most lucrative business model.

  4. facelvega Avatar
    facelvega

    First, it's so Bristol to develop a special five-barrel pneumatic lug wrench for a car with a production total of a handful.
    Second, I take issue with the allegation that Bristols lacked raw performance. Once they started installing big Chrysler V8s from the 407 on, their cars were every bit as fast as the other grandly expensive British GT cars of the day. Motor tested the DB4 in 1960 at 9.3 seconds to 60, a year later the Bristol 407 came in at 9.2 seconds. Pretty quickly thereafter the Jensen CV8, the sporting versions of the DB4, and cars like the Maserati 3500gti were raising the performance bar, which Bristol matched only in '69 when they moved up to a bigger Chrysler V8. But to say they lacked performance just isn't true.

%d bloggers like this: