Review: 2019 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design – Your bimmer replacement is here

Why is it so challenging to design a sedan that, in no particular order, is: good looking, safe, comfortable, well made, sporty, attainable, and functional? If that is something that all automakers aspire to, why do so many of them fall flat on their face? Is it really that challenging? Is it really that difficult to design a vehicle in a way that all those things are addressed? Are productive compromises between engine, chassis, body, interior designers and penny-counters, managers, and executives really that difficult?

This what I have been asking myself while driving this new Volvo S60. I’ve been asking myself that because I found this mid-size sedan to be good looking, safe, comfortable, well made, sporty, attainable, and functional. And I really can’t think of many other sedans that are all those things. That was once BMW’s modus operandi but a quick spin any 3-series of this decade will leave you feeling sort of unfulfilled. Two unexpectedly great sedans are the new Mazda6 with the turbo engine and the Honda Accord with the two-liter engine but still not ideal, and  rather of a different class than this Volvo.

Finding this Volvo almost alone in a world of mid-size sporty sedans that won’t make one feel compromised over buying a midlife crisis special really shocked me. Volvo, the brand that almost died not long ago, the maker of square, sturdy boxes with a focus on safety now makes a sedan that I’d pick over an equivalent bimmer, Benz, an Audi, and certainly over anything Japanese or American. That is unexpected to say the least.

This T6 R-Design model gets 316-horsepower from its turbocharged and supercharged engine. Well programmed eight-speed automatic transmission sends that power all wheels, a system that doesn’t feel like front-wheel-drive despite being biased as so. It’s quick, without lag, smooth, and quiet. I would use the term refined if it wasn’t for a slightly trashy sound when its cold. The gravy on this yummy Swedish meatball (sorry) is that it gets a respectable 32 MPG on the highway.

The car is just a pleasure to drive, be it enthusiastically or just chillin’ on the open highway. The suspension is ideally tuned for either occasion. The double-charged engine has a flat torque curve and the transmission shifts at the right time and without much drama. The AWD system puts the power down impressively, especially when coming out of corners.

Typical minimalist, modern designed Volvo interior is present here, similar in feel to new Range Rovers. Volvo always got the seats right and this is no exception – they are fantastic, even if they seem slightly basic compared to some seats that are overloaded with adjustments that no one will ever use. The fabrics are top-notch. The rear bench seat has a center pass-through and backrests fold down so that even a good size bike can be transported inside with the front wheel off. The trunk is big, too. The Bowers and Wilkins audio system is so good even crap music sounds good on it.

This is a short review because in the week that I spent with this car I really couldn’t find many design faults. The infotainment can be slow but it’s pretty good overall. Online searching resulted in some software issues with the new Volvos and some odd transmission hick-ups. I have a few friends with new-ish XC90s and their cars have all been solid so far.

In terms of attainability, the S60 T5 (turbocharged but not supercharged) starts at $35,800 and goes up from there. The T6 R-Design model in these pictures has the MSRP of $54,490. It’s not cheap, and it isn’t meant to be, but it is attainable. There is also the T8 hybid model and, soon a limited S60 T8 Polestar Engineered model. Best of all, there is a wagon V60, too. But the T6, as seen here is really damn good, as in it’s good looking, safe, comfortable, well made, sporty, attainable, and functional.

[Disclaimer: Volvo loaned us the vehicle for the purpose of this review. Images copyright 2019 Hooniverse/Kamil Kaluski]

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

22 responses to “Review: 2019 Volvo S60 T6 R-Design – Your bimmer replacement is here”

  1. Peter Tanshanomi Avatar

    Damnit! Now I have to want another nice car I can’t afford.

  2. nanoop Avatar

    I know that Volvo design is considered as very good, alas my layman’s eyes see the rear as too busy, the front is a bit shouty (for a Volvo), and either the rear wheels are too small or the front wheels are too big – and why are they connected with a sausage?

    The interior still is of exquisite simplicity, though.

    Disclaimer: I drive ugly cars and am too poor to afford a Volvo outside the 10-20 years of age bracket.

    1. Sjalabais Avatar
      Sjalabais

      I agree, low profile tires, too, are a bit strange. But it is a bold statement by Kamil that this one might be the best choice in its class. Imagine the tears of joy in Gothenburg among their engineers, nurtured into adulthood by Top Gear. They had tried to chase the BMW dream since 1996, with the first S40, a NedCar shared with Mitsubishi. Now, finally, almost a decade after peak BMW, the S60 gets its praise.

      (Yes, I am aware a few reviewers said the 850R was the more sensible M5 in the late 90s, but…c’mon.)

    2. Sjalabais Avatar
      Sjalabais

      I agree, low profile tires, too, are a bit strange. But it is a bold statement by Kamil that this one might be the best choice in its class. Imagine the tears of joy in Gothenburg among their engineers, nurtured into adulthood by Top Gear. They had tried to chase the BMW dream since 1996, with the first S40, a NedCar shared with Mitsubishi. Now, finally, almost a decade after peak BMW, the S60 gets its praise.

      (Yes, I am aware a few reviewers said the 850R was the more sensible M5 in the late 90s, but…c’mon.)

  3. neight428 Avatar
    neight428

    Not a big fan of the rear taillight treatment, but the longroof mostly takes that problem off the table. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5ab34c5ab5828864a6065aedfdfd8d0fab698d54515747e28fceda43c2cdedcc.png

    1. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      Wagonization is always the answer.

      As for the taillights, at least they look more Volvo-like. The sedan’s rear lights are maybe the worst part of the design.

    2. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      Wagonization is always the answer.

      As for the taillights, at least they look more Volvo-like. The sedan’s rear lights are maybe the worst part of the design.

      1. neight428 Avatar
        neight428

        Volvo does it better than nearly everyone too.

        1. Toaster Avatar
          Toaster

          I actually prefer the sedan, the wagons taillights seem like 2 different concepts mashed up in an unfortunate copy/paste accident.

          Also, that potruding plastic panel above the license plate looks like an afterthought on the wagon. The same element soured me on the otherwise gorgeous V90. It’s much worse IRL, and I can’t unsee it.

    3. 0A5599 Avatar
      0A5599

      I had a straight non-running Roadmaster wagon and a complete AWD LSx driveline last year. I wonder how it would have turned out if I threw, say, 1/3 the MSRP of the Volvo into a shotgun wedding for those, and maybe a turbocharger.

      1. Zentropy Avatar
        Zentropy

        That sounds like a dream car combo! What the heck was that out of, a Trailblazer SS? I can’t think of many examples in which GM paired their LS V8s with AWD.

        1. Fuhrman16 Avatar
          Fuhrman16

          The Saab 9-7X Aero (basically a Trailblazer with Saab badges) also used that engine.

        2. 0A5599 Avatar
          0A5599

          Yukon Denali. Escalade cousin also has available AWD.

  4. Zentropy Avatar
    Zentropy

    That interior is certainly a nice place to be, but I personally find the exterior pretty bland. That not-quite-ripe-tomato red paint doesn’t do it any favors, either. Regardless, my main problem with the car is that it’s fundamentally just another ubiquitous transverse-engine, FWD/AWD, automatic-only people mover, a combination that wouldn’t excite me even if was tucked beneath Lamborghini Aventador body panels.

    My interest in a modern sedan requires (1) RWD and (2) a manual transmission, which (sadly) limits my options to a single car: the Genesis G70 2.0T. Fortunately it’s decently handsome, but alternatives would be nice. I think my “Bimmer replacement” may come in a few years from Mazda, who promises a possible RWD sedan with — fingers crossed– an inline six. If it gets a manual option, it might be my goldilocks car.

    1. Peter Tanshanomi Avatar

      I am learning much later than I should have that the devil’s in the details, and the rewards are in the small differences, too. My Kizashi is, on paper, not much different than a half-dozen other compact, mid-spec, mildly “sporty” sedans from 20 years ago. But it’s a little more solid, a little more taut, a little more pretty, a little more clever that a lot of other cars of similar age, cost, size, and mission. It’s kind of like shootin’ irons. You can hand me two different polymer 9mm handguns or two different single-action revolvers—despite their nearly identical configuration, one might be totally yucky at the range, and the other pure heaven.

    2. Peter Tanshanomi Avatar

      I am learning much later than I should have that the devil’s in the details, and the rewards are in the small differences, too. My Kizashi is, on paper, not much different than a half-dozen other compact, mid-spec, mildly “sporty” sedans from 20 years ago. But it’s a little more solid, a little more taut, a little more pretty, a little more clever that a lot of other cars of similar age, cost, size, and mission. It’s kind of like shootin’ irons. You can hand me two different polymer 9mm handguns or two different single-action revolvers—despite their nearly identical configuration, one might be totally yucky at the range, and the other pure heaven.

      1. Zentropy Avatar
        Zentropy

        I won’t disagree with you there– subjective impressions always trump objective measures when it comes to car comparisons, for me at least. Feel is everything, and two cars with nearly identical specs can be on completely opposite ends of the experience spectrum. I simply have a long-standing, repeatedly-tested, admittedly-stubborn bias against FWD (and FWD-based AWD) cars. They have never felt right to me, and I assume it’s because I was raised on RWD. I started motorcycling at 5, driving farm trucks at 10, and didn’t own a FWD until I had kids in my late 20s.

        When my first son was born, I replaced my daily-driver Ranger (2WD, 4.0L, 5-speed) with a Contour SVT, which at the time was as close to a family car as I was willing to concede. My cars up to that point had been mostly torquey V8s, but the Contour’s V6 was pleasantly peppy and smooth. The handling was crisp, and body roll minimal. But even after 150k miles, it still didn’t feel right to me. When my second son arrived, I bit the bullet and traded it in on a minivan. I kept my sanity by commuting in a beater E30 that, to this day, was one of the best cars I ever owned, despite being one of the slowest (it was a 325e). That car taught me momentum driving, and it had wonderful feedback.

        I drive as many vehicles as I find the opportunity to try, through friends, family, whatever. I’ve found a few FWDs that are ok, and a few AWDs that I liked, but I’ve only fallen in love with cars with RWD. I have a similar disdain for automatics, and it all comes down to feel and feedback.

        [Edit: Of note, the Kizashi 6-speed was one of my FWD “likes”. I have begrudgingly praised it in the past, despite its drivetrain layout. It was actually fun to drive. Hold onto that one– it was a rare breed.]

  5. Maymar Avatar
    Maymar

    I know Kamil owned an E46, but I still struggle to connect those to modern Volvos in any real way. Volvos (and I have driven this exact S60, down to the color combo) are nice cars, and they drive nicely, but don’t inspire David E. Davis-style “Turn your hymnals to 2002” levels of hyperbolic praise.

    That said, a lightly equipped V60 would be on my short list of small luxury cars, so I do like them plenty (I also think the 60’s are the Volvos to get, the 90’s are mostly diminishing returns unless you need the size)

    1. Kamil K Avatar

      Between fit and finish (when the E46 were new), driving enjoyment (on roads), and functionality… they’re close. When pushed, as in on a track, the bimmer would perform much better. In other words, don’t expect too many S60s to be turned into race cars in ten years.

  6. outback_ute Avatar
    outback_ute

    While trying to remind myself of S60 chronology (the ‘coupe style’ first gen made a splash in 2000), I found a reference that the new car is built only in the USA – is this right?

    Car looks ok to me, but I don’t want 100% touchscreen/voice controls.

    1. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      I think the first generation still looks sharp. I heard the same thing– Volvo built its first American factory and it will be the sole producer of S60s after the Chinese plant stops making them this year (maybe they already have).

  7. salguod Avatar

    Aestheticly, the person who did the front half should mentor the person who did the back half. The front is cohesive and attractive, but aft of the B pillar things come apart.

    The angles of the top and bottom of the rear door glass seem disconnected from the shoulder line below and the angle of the back light above. The tail light are interesting but too big and too harshly square for the rest of the car.