BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

2020 Toyota Supra vs. 2020 BMW Z4 M40i

It’s unlikely that the average Hooniverse reader is unaware that there is a new Toyota Supra and a new BMW Z4 for 2020. Nor is it a stretch to say that you all likely know that the cars are built from the same G29 BMW platform. However, most people have probably not had the chance to test them back-to-back and likely assume that they are pretty much the same car. I know I did. I recently had a great opportunity to drive both cars hard on a magically twisty rural road near the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland. I’ll run through what I hope will be some valuable consumer advice, and then tell you which one I think is best.

But first, let’s see how we got here.

BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

History

The Toyota トヨタ・スープラ or “Supra” as we know it, started production way back in April of 1978. The first generation A40 and A50 were known as the Celica Supra, a linkage that continued through the early 1980s with the A60. It wasn’t until the third generation of the car that the alignment to the Celica was severed and the A70 was born. That is likely most people’s first memory of the Toyota Supra, but as we all know it really blew up with the A80, aka the MKIV Supra, which began production in April of 1993. That production run sadly ended in August of 2002 but our Supra luck ran out here in the U.S. in 1998.

Meanwhile, the BMW Z lineup dates back to the quirky E30-based Z1, produced from from March 1989 to June 1991. They only built 8000 total and it remains an strange start to BMW’s 2-seat convertible lineup. In case you were wondering, Z stands for zukunft, which is German for “future”, at least according to Wikipedia. Five years later BMW launched the mass-production Z3, which was featured in the Bond movie Golden Eye. I recall looking up briefly from my Nintendo 64 to note that BMW had produced a cool little roadster. Based on the E36 platform, the Z3 spurred several M versions and even the future (current?) classic “clownshoe” coupe. Whereas the Supra had a long hiatus, the Z3 lasted until 2002 when it was replaced by the E85 Z4 roadster and E86 Z4 coupe and eventually the E89 Z4 produced from 2009-2016.

Now We’re Here

So we certainly didn’t start from the bottom, but both the Supra and the Z4 have had storied(ish) but different paths to where we are today. You can go buy both cars brand new in a showroom, so let’s see what’s what before we get into the drive.

2020 BMW Z4

2020 BMW Z4

If you want a new Z4, you have two basic options, the Z4 sDrive30i, which just rolls off of the tongue, or the Z4 M40i. They look pretty similar on the outside, here take a look at the front:

Most of the difference is in the front air dam, with more angular cuts and scoops on the M40i. The sDrive30i looks like it has an overbite. Beyond that, note some slight variations in the color surround the grill. Both cars are available in six different paint colors; of note the M is also available in Misano Blue and Frozen Grey II Metallic. The latter was the color of our test car is was pretty badass, although based on the name it’s possible that BMW may be cross-promoting with Disney for the upcoming Frozen sequel. Sorry, I’ll let it go.

From behind, both cars look pretty much the same. The M40i has slightly larger duct work and a different exhaust shape.

 

Obviously the largest difference in these two cars is the engine. The sDrive30i comes with a 254 horsepower 2.0L turbo 4-cylinder that BMW calls “TwinPower” which likely has nothing to do with Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen, but I can’t confirm that. What it doesn’t mean is twin-turbo, it’s really a single twin-scroll turbocharger. BMW claims 5.2 seconds 0-60 for the sDrive30i. The M40i that I drove is powered by a 382 horsepower 3.0L twin-turbo inline-6 with a BMW-claimed 3.9 seconds to 60. Pricing is $49,700 starting MSRP for the 30i and $63,700 for the 40i.

I won’t spend too many words on the interior. It’s a BMW, it’s nice.

2020 BMW Z4

2020 Toyota Supra

2020 Toyota Supra

The new Supra is slightly more complicated with three versions available at launch: GR Supra 3.0, GR Supra 3.0 Premium, and the GR Supra Launch Edition. As a reminder, “GR” stands for “Gazoo Racing”, which is Toyota’s race team. Just like the BMW, the variations as seen from the outside are slight in most cases.

It’s like one of those electronic bar games, can you spot the differences! When in doubt, check the mirrors when you are Supra-spotting. It’s hard to see in these images, but the 3.0 Premium has lighter colored side-mirrors and obviously a launch edition has red. From the back, it’s even harder to spot the differences.

All Supras come with a similar, but not identical, 3.0L twin-scroll single turbo inline 6-cylinder engine, but with 47 less horses than the BMW (335 hp). The engines use the same crankshaft and bearings, but the cylinder heads, pistons and connecting rods are different. The turbo is technically different as well, the Z4 shares its turbocharger with the BMW M340i, while the Supra shares its with the European-spec BMW Z4 M40i. Pricing for the base GR Supra 3.0 is $49,990, with the 3.0 Premium starting at $53,990, and the Launch Edition will be starting at $55,250 (only 1500 are coming to the U.S.).

The Supra also has an interior. It’s also nice and varies slightly across different trim levels.

Supra interior

BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

Head-to-Head: Touge

Specs and figures are one thing, but how do two cars that share almost identical mechanical bits drive head-to-head? Surprisingly different, that’s how!

The first reason is because of the variation in body type, with large difference in overall feel between Toyota’s coupe and BMW’s convertible. That’s not to say that the Z4 isn’t sharp, it is, but with a hardtop and less weight the Supra felt better on our curvy back road test loop we dubbed the “touge”. And yes, there were loud shouts of “Tooouugeeeeeeee!” each time we approached the stretch of road.

BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

In a post-hydraulic steering era, most journalists banter on about whether you can feel anything through the wheel, so I’ll skip that bit. In this case, I evaluated each car on how well it functioned through our test loop. I really liked the steering in the Z4, particularly in Sport mode, but it wasn’t drastically better than the Supra. I was able to get the Supra to step out a couple of times, with slight oversteer that improved the overall experience significantly.

Having both cars pushing hard on the same road, at the same time, really helped frame the issue here – neither would significantly outrun the other. Not a huge surprise, and there could always be variations in driver ability, but my journalist sparring partners Joel Patel and Will Kinton had their shit together. I imagine that there were teams of engineers from both companies sitting in conference rooms making advanced calculations to ensure that these cars remained competitive with one-another on track. Although I prefer to believe there was a late night saké and weissbier drink-off, last person standing got final say. It was a draw.

BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

With regard to power, the elephant in the room is clearly the nearly 50 horsepower gap between the two cars. Only it actually disappears in the real world. Many magazines have tested the two cars as having nearly identical 0-60 times, a tad under four seconds. The weight difference between the two cars seems to have dissipated some of the Z4’s power advantage, and that came out in our real world test too. On longer stretches, when there wasn’t a Prius in front of us, neither car could pull away from the other. Same went for the tight switchback roads, the transmissions functioned well to keep the power in the right spot. Leave it in automatic mode and thumb the “Sport” setting and both cars generally found the right cog to keep you moving quickly. Of course the paddle shifters were more fun, and of course we lamented the lack of a manual option, as one does.

The Supra makes fun snap and pop sounds from its exhaust along the way. Sure, it’s a bit of theater, but it’s fun and made for a more exciting driving experience.

Summary

There has to be a winner and a loser. There can be only one! In this case, the winner is the Toyota Supra. While the Z4 is a great car, likely the best non-full-M version of any Z3 or Z4, it still felt a bit anonymous compared to the Supra. Perhaps there is some “OMG90s” nostalgia happening for me here, but driving the Supra felt like an event. A group of kids along the side of the road (who should have been in school) exclaimed “What is that!!” when we were making a hasty u-turn in their driveway. Toyota actually delivered on producing a car that looked like the FT-1 concept from 2014. Many lament the notion that it doesn’t look more like an MKIV Supra, but I’ve already seen some cool aftermarket add-ons that fix that with a big wing.

Plus, I haven’t even gotten to the price difference. The Supra starts at just under $50,000 which isn’t cheap, but from an inflation standpoint is actually way cheaper than the last MKIV we had in the states. A 1993 twin-turbo Supra cost $40,890 which is $72,656.58 in 2019 monies. So the Supra would win this competition outright just based on price compared to the $63,700 starting price for the Z4 M40i.

Add all that to the fact that it’s an amazing car to drive, and I am very much able to forget that it’s built in Styria, Austria by Magna Steyr for BMW. And you should too, because the new Supra is here, and it’s fantastic.

Bonus Pics

2020 Toyota Supra

2020 BMW Z4

2020 BMW Z4

BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

BMW Z4 vs. Toyota Supra

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

10 responses to “2020 Toyota Supra vs. 2020 BMW Z4 M40i”

  1. Zentropy Avatar
    Zentropy

    Nice comparison. I figured each manufacturer would put their own flavors into these cars, but wasn’t sure how they’d ultimately “taste” in the end.

    Since I’m not a fan of convertibles, I wasn’t terribly enthusiastic about the Z4. I’m sure it’s mechanically superior to its predecessor, but it doesn’t look like its evolved much. It’s rather… plain.

    The Supra certainly isn’t plain. I applaud the fact that the styling is interesting, but I wish the design elements came together more harmoniously. The headlights are fine, but everything between them (namely, the jutting proboscis) isn’t. The fender bulges give the car a muscular stance, but they’re clumsily integrated into the doors and rockers. The rear is a complete train smash. It’s a shame, because the car’s silhouette from most angles is very appealing, even if the surface details aren’t. I like the forest, just not the trees.

    I wish Toyota had looked beyond the A80 for styling inspiration, and rejected anyone currently in Lexus design from working on the project. When I think “Supra”, I think of the A60, which had a clean, chunky, carved-from-a-wooden-block look to it. I don’t necessarily pine for pop-up headlights, but would have appreciated cleaner lines and less organic, taffy-like shapes. And if Toyota really wanted to re-introduce a halo driver’s car, they could have at least offered a stick shift, even if only the purists would be interested. This kind of car isn’t about numbers, it’s about how it makes you feel when driving it. I would have happily taken a weaker, naturally-aspirated inline six if it came with a third pedal.

    1. William Byrd Avatar
      William Byrd

      Excellent reply, you could do this job!

      Agree about the manual, I’m sure it wouldn’t have been that hard to implement and would have given them some more enthusiast cred. With relatively small volumes I guess that magnifies the price/cost though.

      My bigger issue, and one that I didn’t put in here was the lack of a back seat. I have 3 kids and had the Supra on my radar as my next DD. But without the extra room, it’s more of a 3rd fun car. At that point it’s competing with other sports cars like used ZO6s and the like which is tough company.

    2. William Byrd Avatar
      William Byrd

      Excellent reply, you could do this job!

      Agree about the manual, I’m sure it wouldn’t have been that hard to implement and would have given them some more enthusiast cred. With relatively small volumes I guess that magnifies the price/cost though.

      My bigger issue, and one that I didn’t put in here was the lack of a back seat. I have 3 kids and had the Supra on my radar as my next DD. But without the extra room, it’s more of a 3rd fun car. At that point it’s competing with other sports cars like used ZO6s and the like which is tough company.

      1. neight428 Avatar
        neight428

        I was just about to say how I like the Supra more every time I read about it, but the biggest thing between me and buying one are the broad market of Corvette styles, trims and vintages from which to choose a compelling alternative.

        I think you have to like it more specifically for what it is to take the leap in the new market, I don’t see these getting very cheap out the curve, unless they do the BMW depreciation thing.

      2. neight428 Avatar
        neight428

        I was just about to say how I like the Supra more every time I read about it, but the biggest thing between me and buying one are the broad market of Corvette styles, trims and vintages from which to choose a compelling alternative.

        I think you have to like it more specifically for what it is to take the leap in the new market, I don’t see these getting very cheap out the curve, unless they do the BMW depreciation thing.

    3. outback_ute Avatar
      outback_ute

      I’d actually be interested to see if aftermarket body kits might improve the look; not something I’d usually say. Even a lower hood, assuming there is pedestrian friendly space under there.

      While I haven’t laid eyes on one in the flesh it feels a bit small for a Supra, eg missing +2 seats and from what I understand basically the same size as the 86.

      1. William Byrd Avatar
        William Byrd

        It “feels” bigger than the 86, I’d have to check the actual wheelbase, interior room, etc.

    4. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      Wow guys, I hadn’t even noticed it lacked a rear seat. I just assumed it was a 2+2. Now that I look at it, even the exterior photos suggest there’s no room back there. As someone who prefers sedans to coupes anyway, that’s a deal-killer.

      1. William Byrd Avatar
        William Byrd

        RIght? I wrote something for Oversteer wondering exactly what the Supra is competing with? Corvette? Cayman?

  2. SlowJoeCrow Avatar
    SlowJoeCrow

    I wonder how soon lesser Z4s will get aftermarket M40i air dams. Also on a related note, does anyone know of a Mazda MX-5/Fiat Spider head to head comparison? The NA vs. Turbo and Japanese vs. Italian looks interesting.