Jeep pickup "officially" named Scrambler; images revealed and details confirmed

Expect the Scrambler to be proportionally similar to this, AEV’s JK Wrangler-based Brute

This will come as a surprise to almost nobody, but new reports are confirming that Jeep has decided to give the upcoming Wrangler-based pickup a nostalgic name from the company’s past: Scrambler.
Details of Jeep’s decision to use the heritage-embodying name have been leaked to JLWranglerForums, and deliver on the goods not just in nameplate but also in both engine and the future vehicle’s open-roof design. It appears that Jeep wholeheartedly plans to deliver on the idea of a bed-bearing JL Wrangler, and will introduce the model either alongside its off-road SUV counterpart or shortly after, in what will finally, after a long leave of absence, bring the Jeep brand into a market they haven’t truly occupied since the Comanche went out of production in the early ’90s. This will be a much welcomed addition to the lineup as well as to the field of small/midsize pickups available today, and is an exciting move for Jeep that fans have been clamoring for since the Scrambler concept graced our presence back in 2005.

Last December we explored what Jeep needs to get right with their soon-to-be-in-production truck and now we’re actually seeing what it will look like when it comes to fruition, not just in its appearance but in how it will stack up mechanically and in its unique roof offerings. Hit the jump to read on what new info has come out about the JL Scrambler.
Source: JLWranglerForums

 
Source: JLWranglerForums

I guess we can call this a “breakthrough” in the Land of JL Wrangler: Jeep has finally “confirmed,” apparently through dealer order books, that the pickup based on the next-generation of iconic off-roader will in fact pay homage to past like-purposed models and bear the name Scrambler as a tribute to that of one of its most important ancestors. This aligns with the company’s increasingly heavy history-based model-naming scheme, along with the likes of Renegade, Willys (as Wrangler trim levels), and the rumored upcoming Grand Wagoneer. JLWranglerForums and its sister site, JLScramblerForum, are also reporting that the future Wrangler-based pickup will boast a lengthened JL Wrangler chassis, a choice of open-air roof options, and an available diesel engine.
Source: Jalopnik

As can be deduced from the sources, a few predictions seem to have reigned true, or at least as much so as we can gather from this latest slew of leaks. First, the soft-top and removable hard-top (featuring sectioned roof panels) options that grace the Wrangler are definitely going to be available, making this the only open-air pickup on sale today, a line you’re almost guaranteed to hear in Jeep’s future marketing campaigns. It also appears that the 3.0L turbo-diesel will in fact be offered for the torque-and-MPG-thirsty prospective buyers, and if we’re lucky it’ll be available with the 6-speed manual. Other aspects coming to light (and fruition) are even heavier-duty Dana axles than those on the JK and start-stop tech for the diesel engine, if not for all available powerplants. It’s shaping to be a properly robust truck, not just for a Jeep but for a pickup as a whole.
It also appears that the only available body configuration will be the double-cab, long-bed combo, and herein lies my biggest concerns. While this style might appeal to the widest spread of consumers and draw what will turn into the biggest sales numbers (and volume) right out of the gates, it severely limits the vehicle’s off-road capabilities as compared to other configurations. Whereas the long-length, long-frame style will undoubtedly ride better than shorter-wheelbase counterparts and will feature more interior space and bed volume, the breakover angle and approach angles that result will be severely compromised due to lengthy overhangs and a chassis so long that it limits the ability to climb over the crest of a hill without high-centering the vehicle. That the competition (Tacoma, Colorado/Canyon) offers shorter cab/bed configurations only makes me more hopeful to see an extended-cab, short-bed version of the Jeep. I’m guessing it will depend heavily on the success of the Scrambler once it goes on sale, and the resulting consumer demand for a different set of available bed/body options.
Unfortunately we probably won’t see something along the lines of the twelve-year-old Scrambler Concept

It’s also worth noting how remarkably spot-on the earlier renderings have proven to, or at leas seem to, be. They’re entirely believable as production-ready designs, and are a testament to how far the world of speculation has come, leaving little to our imaginations. The whole process is becoming a bit lengthy though, and reminded me that long before the C7 Corvette was revealed we saw images that ultimately proved to be what could have been from within GM itself; with the Jeep Scrambler we have once again struck the same chord. The difference here, however, is that the length of the official/unofficial reveal of the JL and JT/Scrambler is now surpassing the length of the C7 and rivaling that of the still-yet-to-be-seen mid-engine ‘Vette.
Rendering that pulls at my heart strings courtesy of JLWranglerForums

While we still do not have outright confirmation by Jeep or FCA itself on any of the above, we’re getting to the point at which we can assume a lot of it as factual. That Jeep will be selling a Wrangler-based pickup within the next two years or so is a seriously exciting and is absolutely a piece of automotive news to look forward to, and we should know reasonably soon, perhaps at the upcoming LA Auto Show in November (or in April at the New York Auto Show if they need more time), exactly what will be for sale at your local Jeep dealer come 2018. The takeaway from today’s news is that as great as it will be to see the Scrambler name out on the roads again, it seems that the truck itself is being given the chance of being great on its own merits. Now we can only hope that it lives up to the legacy of the original.
The AEV Brute, what the JT/Scrambler will likely resemble proportionally

Sources: JLWranglerForums.com and JeepScramblerForum.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

15 responses to “Jeep pickup "officially" named Scrambler; images revealed and details confirmed”

  1. dukeisduke Avatar
    dukeisduke

    Do you think it’ll be that close to the Brute? I’ve seen a couple of the Brutes at Collins Bros. Jeep, and I’ve even seen Dennis Collins driving a black one, on my way home from work in the afternoon. In person, the Brute doesn’t look as long as it does in pictures.

    1. Ross Ballot Avatar
      Ross Ballot

      Similar, yes, but it will be even longer. The JL has a longer hood than the JK on which the Brute is based, it will have more room between the front wheelwell and the cab, inevitably a larger cabin, and then add the lengthened chassis to accommodate the pickup…it’ll be like you took a Brute, put it on a giant copy machine, and hit “SCALE TO 115%”

      1. dukeisduke Avatar
        dukeisduke

        Wow, that will be long. The longer the wheelbase gets, the more problems it would have getting high centered, unless it’s lifted.

  2. smalleyxb122 Avatar
    smalleyxb122

    It’s also worth noting how remarkably spot-on the earlier renderings have proven to be.
    Because it is so difficult to speculate on how the next generation Wrangler will look?

    1. Ross Ballot Avatar
      Ross Ballot

      Early rumors were of it taking a much more extreme variation on the JK-formula…

  3. ptschett Avatar
    ptschett

    Always glad to see that someone else out there subscribes to my theory of having contrasting colors for the individual parts of the assembly in CAD. (Though here I’m gonna guess it went with a caption like “green is this material/thickness, blue is this, etc”)

    1. kogashiwa Avatar
      kogashiwa

      I do the same thing.

    2. salguod Avatar

      I make my CAD models in approximately the color the production parts will be. But I’m a designer by training, not an engineer.

      1. ptschett Avatar
        ptschett

        Also a valid method; I mainly don’t use it because 95% of my parts are either molded from black plastic or painted black after the pieces are welded together, and I just find it easier to tell what’s what when there’s more variation.

  4. outback_ute Avatar
    outback_ute

    It will be interesting to see how it compares to the midsize pickups like the Tacoma/Hilux/Colorado/Ranger, it seems like the wheelbase might even be longer than those (say 124-126″), leaving the solid front axle as the only real point of difference

    1. Kiefmo Avatar
      Kiefmo

      I think that is the most important point of difference, honestly. 4WD systems for IRS-equipped trucks have come a long way, but there’s a lot of value in just being able to ensure that a tire is on the ground instead of lifted high into the air.
      I wonder how many Jeep-owning overlanding aficionados have pined for a Taco or Colorado, but held onto their Jeep because of the extra measure of ability afforded by that front axle setup? Jeep is betting that there are a lot of them out there.

  5. Rover 1 Avatar
    Rover 1

    By the time it’s out, will Jeep be owned by Great Wall of China?

  6. Kiefmo Avatar
    Kiefmo

    Why does the Brute use those forged-in-cocaine wheels from an ’80s Ferrari?

  7. JayP Avatar
    JayP

    I guess my hope for a single cab, 4×4 diesel is dashed. No steel wheels, no hearing aid beige.
    Wild stab at MSRP: $40k.

    1. Ross Ballot Avatar
      Ross Ballot

      I’m willing to bet on next-to-no chance of the bare-bones model of your dreams, but wouldn’t be surprised to see diesel Rubicon models pass the $50k mark