Found on CraigsList: A four-cylinder, daily-driven Mercury Comet

Comet_CL
As odd as it seems, this automotive writer has never really had a dream car. I have enthusiasm for a variety of makes and models, but none have ever struck me as a “must-own.” Instead, I typically fancy a car for a few weeks or months and then file it away to my dream garage for when I have a few thousand-dollar bills laying around. Lately, the early 1960s Mercury Comet has been the car of my fancy; I love the Ford Falcon (its platform mate) lines blended with a vestigial 1950s fin and, for whatever reason, the crosshairs on the front fenders complete the look.
In my mind, I’d love a nice driver in teal with the original Ford 170 six-cylinder engine, but a recent CraigsList search turned up a primer gray 1962 Comet in North Carolina. I like that look just fine, actually, but the interesting part is (allegedly) under the hood: The seller—who is apparently trying to gauge interest—has swapped in the fuel-injected Ford Lima 2.3-liter engine and five-speed transmission from a Ford Ranger along with the 8-inch rear end from a Ford Maverick. The Lima is a robust and durable mill and, according to the seller who claims to daily drive it, the four-banger Comet will get gas mileage in the high 20s, making this a surprisingly practical 53-year-old car.
The ad lists the car for $7,000, which seems a bit much without showing the mechanical bits of the car, but I kind of love the idea of this car. Am I crazy? Is this automotive travesty or triumph? And here is perhaps a bigger question: What kind of cars should someone who loves the idea of this car consider a “must-own?”
Full text for posterity:

Just seeing if anyone might be interested in this. I don’t want to sell, but have found another project I want. This is a daily driven car. It has a 2.3 fuel injected engine and 5 speed manual out of a 93 ranger. Has front disk brakes and an 8 inch rear out of a 71 maverick. Gets close to 30 mpg . Body is in great shape and is primered gray. No trades unless they include a 5 speed truck and cash .

[Asheville CraigsList]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

  1. Tanshanomi Avatar

    I kind of love the idea of this car. Am I crazy?
    No, kind of loving this makes you kind of awesome.
    Is this automotive travesty or triumph?
    A triumph. The 2.3L motor, despite being known somewhat derisively as the “Pinto motor,” is one of the most solid 4-bangers around. The EFI will surely make this car more efficient and more driveable than an old carb’d six. The disc brakes and 5-speed are just icing on the gray-primered cake.
    What kind of cars should someone who loves the idea of this car consider a “must-own?”
    I don’t know if you’re a ragtop kind of guy, but a ’67-’69 Dodge Dart convertible is on MY personal want list. It was a solid, reliable, RWD unibody that was a direct Falcon/Comet competitor. ’67-’69s could be had with everything from the slant-6 to a 340 V8 with a four-speed box. The body was larger than the Falcon, with more interior room, and really clean, modern lines that I think still look great today.
    http://carbuzzard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CB-Dodge_Dart-Conv_1967_GT-lrq1.jpg

    1. The Rusty Hub Avatar
      The Rusty Hub

      I’m not a convertible guy, but the same-era Dart is definitely on my radar, too.

    2. 7FIAT's Later Avatar
      7FIAT’s Later

      Look up bullet-proof and there will be a picture of that 2.3 and Mazda sourced 5-speed. I had that combo in my 94 Ranger and in 20 years of ownership it got a new clutch at 130,000 which would have lasted longer except for hoonage and beside plugs that is all the maintenance it ever required.

  2. buzzboy7 Avatar
    buzzboy7

    I live in NC and I sold a two door 1962 Mercury Comet a few years back. I got excited at the title, but nope, not my old car. This is a cool car and I drivetrain I would have probably enjoyed in mine as my 289 was very tired.

    1. The Rusty Hub Avatar
      The Rusty Hub

      [Enthusiastic applause]
      I would drive the hell outta that.

  3. dukeisduke Avatar
    dukeisduke

    No underhood pictures?

  4. e46chris Avatar
    e46chris

    I’m a bit of both. I can’t imagine getting rid of my aging e46, but I also want something completely different. I really want a mid-70s GM x-body. Like this:
    http://santafe.craigslist.org/cto/4859218950.html

  5. e46chris Avatar
    e46chris

    I’m a bit of both. I can’t imagine getting rid of my aging e46, but I also want something completely different. I really want a mid-70s GM x-body. Like this:

  6. LEROOOY Avatar
    LEROOOY

    A few years ago I saw something similar where a guy had installed a modestly-sized Ecoboost into an old Edsel sedan. As a person with little to no concern about engine noise characteristics, I love this idea.
    You could probably fit a toolbox under the hood with all of the extra space made available!

    1. Scoutdude Avatar
      Scoutdude

      No it was not an Ecoboost even if the author implied that, it was a 2.3 out of an 80’s Thunderbird Turbo Coupe.

  7. Scoutdude Avatar
    Scoutdude

    Right up my alley. I’ve had a think for the early Comets though I prefer the 1964 and I’d love to stick a Ranger power train in one. The only difference is that I would go for the Vulcan 3.0 and 5sp. I wouldn’t mind doing it to a Falcon or 65-66 Mustang either. The Vulcan is pretty short so it would be a front-mid engine car, like a Corvette, with most if not all of the actual engine behind the front axle center line.