Quantcast

Home » In General » Currently Reading:

BMW 535i Model Bloat: A Case Study

Jim Yu October 4, 2012 In General

In driving a friend’s 2011 BMW F10 535i, I was overwhelmed by the number and complexity of the luxury and automated features. Add to that the extra safety features, and we’re talking (insert a celebrity who has gained a lot of weight)-sized model bloat.

Don’t get me wrong, the new 535i is an incredible car. It’s fast and sporty and exudes quality. But it’s just so darn big, and yet the interior is a bit snug, almost cramped. The plethora of buttons, controls, and odd icons are dizzying. It took me a minute just to figure out how to use the toggle transmission lever. The tranny, by the way, has eight forward speeds and five clutches.

I compared the stats for the various 535i iterations and came up with this chart:

Despite the longer wheelbase, the newer models are not necessarily roomier inside. And the increase in power has almost been completely offset by the extra weight. This begs the question: With respect to luxury sports sedans like the 5-series, is the model bloat worth it?  

Images source: The F10 picture is courtesy Autoblog. The 5-series line-up photo has been passed around so much online, I have no idea who originally uploaded it. I shall assume it’s BMW.

Currently there are "60 comments" on this Article:

  1. ramLlama says:

    So, just throwing this out here, but I have a feeling that the increasing rear legroom vs decreasing front legroom is due to increasing sales in BRIC countries. In India, at least, when you are wealthy enough to own a 5 series, you do not drive yourself. You sit in the back and get chauffeured.

    Any thoughts on this? Does this sound plausible?

    As for whether it is worth it, the questions is for whom. For BMW, sure! People like bigger cars, they are status symbols. And BMW is now a luxury car maker who sells on their old sporting pretensions. I have no doubt that this car is more than capable, but it is more luxury than sport as opposed to previous years.

  2. david42 says:

    This would be much more obscure, but I'd love to see the % from each generation that were ordered as a stick-shift. With the F10, it's zero, of course.

    • Kamil_K says:

      Currently the 535i, 550i, and the M5 are available with manual transmissions.

      The questions of how many of them actually are…

      • david42 says:

        Ah, I stand corrected.

        If my recent experience with trying to find a manual transmission F30 3-series is relevant, then the answer still (almost) 0. I was trying to help my friends find the aforementioned 3-series stick-shift, and they learned that in the entire US, there are 18 such vehicles–and that includes all those scheduled to arrive in the next 30 days!

        • Maymar says:

          For what it's worth, I deal with a BMW dealer who must have about five 2012s in stock with the manual. That said, they're all 320i's (Canadian market), so probably price-leader specials. Not a problem for me though, as I'm a cheap bastard, and 0-60 in the low 7s seems plenty swift enough.

    • Officer Farva says:

      I'm still trying to figure out what the big deal is about manual transmissions.

      I'd love something in-between as I have no knowledge of manuals (though my father could theoretically have trained me as he did use manual transmissions at one point in his life).

      Other than that, if it goes fast, I don't give two shits how it gets there.

      • skitter says:

        The only way to figure it out is to learn to drive one.
        If you're ever in Atlanta, I give lessons.

        • jeepjeff says:

          I typed up three different things and deleted them. It's too subtle to describe in a blog comment.

          Which means, you're right. You just have to learn to know what you're missing.

      • BAMacPherson says:

        Luckily there are all kinds of in betweens available now. With manually shifting automatics, to automatic-shifting manuals.

        No one can explain why the people who love manuals, love manuals. Its like trying to explain the amazingness of sex, to someone who's never experienced it. You've just got to be in the right car, on the right road, with the right music and some candles and… wait…

        • Ate Up With Motor says:

          I don't think it's quite that ephemeral. The complaint I've often had about automatic transmissions is one that I've found myself repeating often in other contexts: just because someone (or something) does something for you doesn't mean they necessarily do it well.

          My experience with automatics over the years has often involved tricking them into doing what I need them to do, rather than what their mechanical or electronic control systems think they should do. Even with transmissions that ostensibly offer manual shift controls, that can be a hassle, which has led me to conclude that I'm better off doing the shifting for myself. It's more work, but less frustration.

      • Mad_Science says:

        Once you learn, there are few instances where an automatic is better.

        The best I way I could describe it is the difference between good food/beer/wine/liquor and just ok.

        By almost any analytical measure, they're equivalent, but once you can recognize the difference, it's hard to go back to Bud Light.

        That said, I have almost no taste in wine, so I can appreciate people's inability to appreciate things.

      • TurboBrick says:

        The best way to describe is that to me, automatics have always felt like they have a really mushy power delivery. With a stick shift the whole business of changing gears is a more crisp event and it doesn't feel like your driveshaft is made out of rubber until the rpms pick up. You can really feel the difference between the power profiles of different engines at slow speeds, i.e. Volvo straight-5 or a PRV feels like a locomotive compared to small 4-cylinders.

      • Roto says:

        Actually most people will notice zero performance difference between manual and automatic with the possibility that the latter may be slightly faster. Other than that, the auto usually will get better MPGs. But some people just prefer manuals. (Ferrari for example offers no manuals because their particular auto is much faster than any manual.) That's about it.

      • Maymar says:

        There's a lot to it. Personally, I find it makes a small engine quite a bit more usable – there's often less power lost, it's a more direct connection, and if you ever want to pass, you can kick down a gear or two in preparation, instead of mashing the gas and hoping the transmission responds promptly. In traffic, you can use engine braking to moderate your speed a little more. And then there's just the extra sense of connection to your car, especially with a really good shifter. If you can, find someone with a Civic to teach you stick.

  3. MVEilenstein says:

    What I see is a big jump in low-end performance (0-60, 1/4 mile). However, the car has gained over half a ton, gained little room in the cabin, and is very large.

    It's changed from a cheetah to a lion.

  4. buzzboy7 says:

    I'll take an E34. I've just never been a huge 5 series fan. For a luxury sedan, the E28 was "almost" there, the E39 was really nice but a bit round for me, and past that it's just a big sloppy floppy pig looking piece of lard.

  5. Irishzombieman says:

    That car on the right's hankerin' for a hoagie.

    <img src="http://imageshack.us/a/img845/7449/nicholsonq.jpg"&gt;

  6. Rust-MyEnemy says:

    The above photo should be todays BMW product lineup.

    You want responsive and lightweight? Take the E28. You want refined, low-drama thrust? F10. If I cound buy a new E39; the car that sits right in the middle as the best of both worlds; I'd do it like a shot.

  7. JayP2112 says:

    I'd like to see this comparo made with the Golf.

  8. Devin says:

    When the F10 was first introduced I said it looked like a fat kid in a cake store, I stand by that assessment.

  9. Kamil_K says:

    If you're looking for a smaller 5-series, just go and buy a 3-series.

    Crazy, right? No, the current 3 is similar in size to the E34 and E39. It also happens to be an excellent car.

  10. CABEZAGRANDE says:

    I've finally seen a few F10s around, and they are freaking HUGE. Definitely bigger than my friends E38 740i (SWB). And yet, like you said,surprisingly small inside. I'd take an E39 over an F10 every day of the week. Last of the truly great looking BMWs, before Bangle sank his poison claws into them, and a nice balance of luxury and simplicity.

  11. muthalovin says:

    E39 was my personal favorite. It is impressive how bad model-bloat is.

    • Abwap says:

      A wee bit too much romantticizing the past here imo. The performance is significantly better and try a serious crash in one of the older models vs today and see how you feel. If it is too big and luxurious for you, get a 1 series.

  12. Stu_Rock says:

    At 73 in wide and 193 in long, there's no reason to call these cars huge. That's solidly in the midsize range. At 4300 lb, they are admittedly pretty heavy.

    One should only get emphatic about cars being huge when they're longer than 220 in or wider than 78 in.

    Of course if the interior room is not commensurate with the exterior girth, that's a significant design error.

    • CABEZAGRANDE says:

      The stats on the new 535 are all almost identical to those of the E38 7 series of just 10 years ago, and that was hardly what you'd call a small car. Width is basically identical. Total length on the SWB E38 was just 3" longer at 196". The 535 is heavier than all but the 750i E38s, which were long wheelbase and had a very heavy V12 on board. I wouldn't say it's huge, but just 10 years ago it would have been considered a large full size car. So compared to past 5 series, it is a massive car.

      • Stu_Rock says:

        Are you European? No 7-series has ever been a "large full size" car. Not even the newest F02 760Li. The SWB E38 is a "just barely full size" car.

        A true full-size car in North America should be both wider than 75 in and longer than 210 in.

  13. hwyengr says:

    I still fire up Ronin every now and again to hear the E34 M5 screaming in all it's glory.

  14. Jay says:

    By the way, what do you guys get for the algebra equation depicted on the stickshift? I've got, ummmm, 22, I'm pretty sure.

    Oh, and how much does just ONE of those clutches gonna cost when the car's off warranty and is in hoon ownership?

  15. alain says:

    seeing that chart makes me <3 my e28 535i even more (especially since the engine is far from stock with bolt-ons) most cargo volume of them all! for dead hooker/spare part storage!!

  16. Frere P. says:

    A graphic illustration of the old joke about each new BMW being better than the one that will follow it.

  17. Van_Sarockin says:

    Sad progression, especially the eleven hundred extra pounds. I wonder how much of that is in electric motors and electronics?

  18. ALFA_MOBILI says:

    because americans like 'em big.

  19. peter boehler says:

    How much weight gain is attributable to regulated mandatory safety equipment that was not a factor for the earlier models? Weight gain requires power gain to retain performance, but power has gone beyond that to make it faster for competitive reasons. Biuyers do not NEED the extra power, but marketing tells them they do need it. It would be interesting to see comparable real world fuel efficiency changes over the years but I fear we cannot get apples to apples on that. Modern engine management and system manipulations may mean the faster heavier new car is also somewhat more fuel efficient, but I do not know the facts.

  20. frink84 says:

    the e28 535i actually comes in at 3430cc with the m30b34, while the 533i had the m30b32 with 3210cc.

  21. Peter says:

    I personally feel that the bigger the item is, does not necessarily mean the better it will get. I find it to be pretty much redundant if BMW were to come up with new models that are bigger in size but the overall performance level is almost similar to the previous model. It is a waste of resources and definitely not worth launching. It's true that every automaker needs to keep up with the ever-evolving technology, but a constant bloat at each new model launch, is not necessary if it doesn't serve any benefit.

Search

Hooniverse Marketplace

Featuring Top 2/3 of vehicles Available in Marketplace

Read more





Subscribe via RSS