Quantcast

Home » Two-Wheel Tuesday » Currently Reading:

Two Wheel Tuesday: Harley Davidson gives us Seventy Two reasons to be Slim

Wayne Moyer February 7, 2012 Two-Wheel Tuesday

Harley Davidson Seventy-Two

Harley Davidson introduces you to its new models: the Sportster Seventy-Two and the Softail Slim. Harley Davidson designed these bikes during their two slowest sales years. By refocusing on their lower end bikes and working hard to help them stand out Harley Davidson with some impressive design. These should help The Motor Company recapture the sales it had in the past. 

[Source and images: Harley Davidson]

Sportster Seventy-Two:

Harley Davidson dips into a newer vein of design. After spending decades reliving the post war years The Motor Company has decided to appeal to a more modern audience. Using stylistic elements that remind you of the classic peanut gas tank of the 70′s Sportster’s and the Springer style front end. Let’s be honest, who wouldn’t want to look like Evil Knievel? As Triumph has shown with the Bonneville reviving the seventies can work for sales. The Seventy-Two starts at $10,499.

Softtail Slim:

Moving a bit upmarket from the Seventy Two, starting at $15,499, this Slim also moves you up one entire model line. This Softail leans on the blackout Night Train look that Harley Davidson has been releasing across it’s lines for quite a while now. It appears to a broader base then the 72 does by offering a muscle bike look with matte black paint and a very low seat height. 

No related posts.

Currently there are "17 comments" on this Article:

  1. dead_elvis says:

    Don't forget to buy as much H-D branded gear & "lifestyle accessories" as your credit card will allow.

  2. ptschett says:

    I never could see why a super low seat height was a good thing. But, this is coming from a six-footer whose riding experience is mostly on a dual-sport. The only H-D that appeals to me is the XR1200X (the only thing wrong with it is the MSRP, I just can't see spending more than $10,000 on a bike.)

  3. facelvega says:

    I find the 72 quite handsome, the Softtail Slim not so much. But way too practical. For that price I could have a 2WD Ural with sidecar! Or for 2/3 as much, an Enfield Bullet! No-brainer.

    • Jim-Bob says:

      Have to agree with you on the Ural. Harleys are just too common for my taste but an updated version of a Soviet copy of an old BMW bike is just too cool to pass up. Plus, the Ural has a functionalistic style that the Harley can only hope for. Make mine Warsaw Pact green!

      • B72 says:

        I drove a Ural 20 years ago. That thing was a blast! The only thing that would make it hard to live with is the low top speed (about 55 MPH max on the example I rode)

        I got more grins per mile out of that bike than anything I've ridden before or since. Apparently going slow gives you more time to grin.

    • pj134 says:

      Hooniverse, Land of the Masochists.

Search



Have you visited Hooniverse's Retro Tech site, AtomicToasters?

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin